Check out this picture...
#41
RE: Check out this picture...
ORIGINAL: Tomkat08
I know what ghosting is mate. And your right about that, but you can see also there is no shadow from anything especially the arrow itself. With a flash, such as what is seen in this image there will very well be one from the arrow or the deer itself.
If you zoom all the way it it was clone brushed then an eraser was used to touch up the edges. This is where the humps came from mate. I have seen this thousands of times, and if you try to clean up too much you get this effect. If you did it with single pixel size you wont see it as much.
Im dead set on it being a fake image here. Too much visual evidence on the edges of the deer from a touched up image.
I know what ghosting is mate. And your right about that, but you can see also there is no shadow from anything especially the arrow itself. With a flash, such as what is seen in this image there will very well be one from the arrow or the deer itself.
If you zoom all the way it it was clone brushed then an eraser was used to touch up the edges. This is where the humps came from mate. I have seen this thousands of times, and if you try to clean up too much you get this effect. If you did it with single pixel size you wont see it as much.
Im dead set on it being a fake image here. Too much visual evidence on the edges of the deer from a touched up image.
#43
RE: Check out this picture...
ORIGINAL: HuntingBry
Some of you guys really need a life. I have transparent deer on my game camera that weren't shot, just moving. I believe it's real, but could care less.
Some of you guys really need a life. I have transparent deer on my game camera that weren't shot, just moving. I believe it's real, but could care less.
Every other pic that gets posted on this forum gets the royal shakedown from all of the self-proclaimedPhotoshop expertslike nobody really kills a big deer legally or catches anything decent on their trail cams in real life.
#45
RE: Check out this picture...
ORIGINAL: nchawkeye
That deer must have been shot with a Rage!!!
That deer must have been shot with a Rage!!!
#46
RE: Check out this picture...
ORIGINAL: IL_BOW_MAN
If I recall right...I am not reading 14 pages of crap on AT again...but I beleive his relative said it was shot with a rage.
ORIGINAL: nchawkeye
That deer must have been shot with a Rage!!!
That deer must have been shot with a Rage!!!
#48
RE: Check out this picture...
ORIGINAL: Sooner State Hunter
Yep, on the South Carolina forum where this was originally posted they said it was a Rage. In fact they said he sent the pic to both Cuddeback and Rage to "see if they could use it". Cuddeback said it was too graphic. They didn't say what Rage's response was.
ORIGINAL: IL_BOW_MAN
If I recall right...I am not reading 14 pages of crap on AT again...but I beleive his relative said it was shot with a rage.
ORIGINAL: nchawkeye
That deer must have been shot with a Rage!!!
That deer must have been shot with a Rage!!!
And I'm on the record too for this being a real picture. Ok, carry on.
#49
RE: Check out this picture...
Somebody get the kid in here and have him show it to us straight off the deer cam.I think it is real. ****lly had a pic like this from his deer cam and the same transparent affect happened to the deer.
#50
RE: Check out this picture...
ORIGINAL: Sport4
Somebody get the kid in here and have him show it to us straight off the deer cam.I think it is real. ****lly had a pic like this from his deer cam and the same transparent affect happened to the deer.
Somebody get the kid in here and have him show it to us straight off the deer cam.I think it is real. ****lly had a pic like this from his deer cam and the same transparent affect happened to the deer.
No offense Kelly!!