![]() |
RE: How do you define "effective range?"
ORIGINAL: MGH_PA ORIGINAL: gzg38b Get your hunting clothes on. Screw on your broadeads. Climb your treestand, and place a 3d target at 30 yards. You get ONE arrow. If you hitBOTH lungs I'll give you $100. If you MISS the lungs, YOU give ME $1,000. Would you take that bet? If not, 30 yards is beyond your "effective range". Interesting way of putting it. I'm not even sure I would take that bet at 20yds (although I'm almost positive I could hit it). Not to say the risk of a monetary loss is greater than wounding a live animal, but your scenario (in my case) wouldn't be a true measurement of my effective range. I'm not a gambling man, or much of a risk taker for that matter;) If you can't do that, I'd say that distance is beyond your effective range. |
RE: How do you define "effective range?"
ORIGINAL: gzg38b ORIGINAL: cooter144 To me "effective range" is the range that I am VERY confident in making a good clean killing shot on an animial. Currently I would say my effective range is 30 yards even though I have killed a couple at longer distances. Would you take the bet I mentioned above, since your effective range is 30 yards? I will tell you that I have taken 30+ animals at ranges from 10-35 yards and have only lost one (hit the shoulder blade on a twenty yard shot where the deer was on a slow walk). Nobody is perfect and a bad shot can happen at any range. I could sit in a tree stand and shoot some pretty tight groups from thirty yards and the kill zone on a 3d target is pretty big...so hmm...maybe I would be willing to steal your $100.;) |
RE: How do you define "effective range?"
ORIGINAL: gzg38b ORIGINAL: MGH_PA ORIGINAL: gzg38b Get your hunting clothes on. Screw on your broadeads. Climb your treestand, and place a 3d target at 30 yards. You get ONE arrow. If you hitBOTH lungs I'll give you $100. If you MISS the lungs, YOU give ME $1,000. Would you take that bet? If not, 30 yards is beyond your "effective range". Interesting way of putting it. I'm not even sure I would take that bet at 20yds (although I'm almost positive I could hit it). Not to say the risk of a monetary loss is greater than wounding a live animal, but your scenario (in my case) wouldn't be a true measurement of my effective range. I'm not a gambling man, or much of a risk taker for that matter;) If you can't do that, I'd say that distance is beyond your effective range. |
RE: How do you define "effective range?"
ORIGINAL: MGH_PA ORIGINAL: gzg38b ORIGINAL: MGH_PA ORIGINAL: gzg38b Get your hunting clothes on. Screw on your broadeads. Climb your treestand, and place a 3d target at 30 yards. You get ONE arrow. If you hitBOTH lungs I'll give you $100. If you MISS the lungs, YOU give ME $1,000. Would you take that bet? If not, 30 yards is beyond your "effective range". Interesting way of putting it. I'm not even sure I would take that bet at 20yds (although I'm almost positive I could hit it). Not to say the risk of a monetary loss is greater than wounding a live animal, but your scenario (in my case) wouldn't be a true measurement of my effective range. I'm not a gambling man, or much of a risk taker for that matter;) If you can't do that, I'd say that distance is beyond your effective range. Personally I'd rather lose $1,000 on a bet than wound an animal. My maximum effective range is that maximum range that I'd be willing to accept this bet. For me, that's about 25 yards. |
RE: How do you define "effective range?"
ORIGINAL: gzg38b ORIGINAL: MGH_PA ORIGINAL: gzg38b ORIGINAL: MGH_PA ORIGINAL: gzg38b Get your hunting clothes on. Screw on your broadeads. Climb your treestand, and place a 3d target at 30 yards. You get ONE arrow. If you hitBOTH lungs I'll give you $100. If you MISS the lungs, YOU give ME $1,000. Would you take that bet? If not, 30 yards is beyond your "effective range". Interesting way of putting it. I'm not even sure I would take that bet at 20yds (although I'm almost positive I could hit it). Not to say the risk of a monetary loss is greater than wounding a live animal, but your scenario (in my case) wouldn't be a true measurement of my effective range. I'm not a gambling man, or much of a risk taker for that matter;) If you can't do that, I'd say that distance is beyond your effective range. Personally I'd rather lose $1,000 on a bet than wound an animal. My maximum effective range is that maximum range that I'd be willing to accept this bet. For me, that's about 25 yards. |
RE: How do you define "effective range?"
Get your hunting clothes on. Screw on your broadeads. Climb your treestand, and place a 3d target at 30 yards. You get ONE arrow. If you hitBOTH lungs I'll give you $100. If you MISS the lungs, YOU give ME $1,000. Would you take that bet? If not, 30 yards is beyond your "effective range". |
RE: How do you define "effective range?"
ORIGINAL: rybohunter Get your hunting clothes on. Screw on your broadeads. Climb your treestand, and place a 3d target at 30 yards. You get ONE arrow. If you hitBOTH lungs I'll give you $100. If you MISS the lungs, YOU give ME $1,000. Would you take that bet? If not, 30 yards is beyond your "effective range". |
RE: How do you define "effective range?"
ORIGINAL: gzg38b ORIGINAL: MGH_PA ORIGINAL: gzg38b ORIGINAL: MGH_PA ORIGINAL: gzg38b Get your hunting clothes on. Screw on your broadeads. Climb your treestand, and place a 3d target at 30 yards. You get ONE arrow. If you hitBOTH lungs I'll give you $100. If you MISS the lungs, YOU give ME $1,000. Would you take that bet? If not, 30 yards is beyond your "effective range". Interesting way of putting it. I'm not even sure I would take that bet at 20yds (although I'm almost positive I could hit it). Not to say the risk of a monetary loss is greater than wounding a live animal, but your scenario (in my case) wouldn't be a true measurement of my effective range. I'm not a gambling man, or much of a risk taker for that matter;) If you can't do that, I'd say that distance is beyond your effective range. Personally I'd rather lose $1,000 on a bet than wound an animal. My maximum effective range is that maximum range that I'd be willing to accept this bet. For me, that's about 25 yards. See my original post to you... Not to say the risk of a monetary loss is greater than wounding a live animal |
RE: How do you define "effective range?"
Just thought about it some more after shooting all these months...20yds, I think I would take the $1000 risk:D 30yds...who knows. So maybe 20 is truly my effective range;)
|
RE: How do you define "effective range?"
ORIGINAL: gzg38b ORIGINAL: gzg38b Get your hunting clothes on. Screw on your broadeads. Climb your treestand, and place a 3d target at 30 yards. You get ONE arrow. If you hitBOTH lungs I'll give you $100. If you MISS the lungs, YOU give ME $1,000. Would you take that bet? If not, 30 yards is beyond your "effective range". Isn't there also alot of pressure when you're shooting at a live animal? To me, this bet is the best way to simulate a live hunting situation: one shot (no practice), from a treestand, with broadheads, at a 3d target, AND the added element of pressure. At least you know the target isn't doing to duck the string! Personally I'd rather lose $1,000 on a bet than wound an animal. My maximum effective range is that maximum range that I'd be willing to accept this bet. For me, that's about 25 yards. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:23 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.