Give me your opinions on the age of these bucks from 2007. I think I know what there age is but I'd like everyone elses opinion as well.

1.


2.



3.


4.



5.

Schultzy, I always fail these test.....

Here Goes
1. ??????

2. 3 1/2

3. 3 1/2 +

4. 4 1/2

5. 4 1/2

#1, You got me...they are all good deer....Good luck with them this year!!!!

Ican't ever guess ages on deer, but I have to say that if that deer in picture 5 wasn't blurry, it would be an awesome picture to have blown up and framed.

I know it!! Its do damn blurry but it sure is a nice buck weight and rack size.

The only one I can see (good enough to guess) is the last one.
I would say 4 1/2

#1....2.5-3.5 rack says 2.5, face says 3.5
#2....3.5
#3....3.5 maybe 4.5
#4....2.5
#5....3.5
#6....4.5

Remember, we grow 'em big here in MN. How about you put one on the ground so we can get a better look at its jaw.

My guesses are just guesses also Tex!! Here's my take on them and there just opinions.

1. 5.5+- Reason being he's skinny and he's got one long nose on him. He's a fairly tall deer body wise also.

2. 4.5- He's a 150" buck and a fairly good size body, to big to be a 3.5 I think in my area.

3. 4.5+- Huge body and a huge melon as well. I don't think he'll ever be a 140" buck.

4. 3.5- He's very close to P&Y right now if not in. He seems to have a smaller body like a 3.5 year old (160lbs or so dressed). I passed this buck up.

5. 4.5- He's heavy rack wise and body wise, 200lb dressed deer I think.

There's 5 bucks in the pictures, not 6. Look how there numbered in the opening post.

I would saythat any one of those has about 3 months in addition to their present age!!!!

Very true!![8D]