Hunt By Numbers.
07-08-2008 | 06:49 PM
#41
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,796
Likes: 0
From:
RE: Hunt By Numbers.
I work for a Cellular phone service carrier. In Cellsite Tech terms we have what is called an MSA and an RSA. An MSA is a "Metropolitan Service Area". An RSA is a "Rural Service Area". It all boils down to this. Some of us hunt in MSA's and some hunt in RSA's.
Same old BS, different day.
LT
Same old BS, different day.
LT
....
07-08-2008 | 09:30 PM
#45
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,161
Likes: 0
From: West Ky.
RE: Hunt By Numbers.
I've seen something like this before, but the odds were based on B&C bucks instead of age, someone else can find out how many 5 1/2 year olds it takes to get a B&C buck. The odds weremuch better than I thought. They took the number oflicensed hunters over a 10 year period and divided by the the number of170" typical and 195" nontypicals foreach state over the same 10 year period. I can'tremember the exact numbers, but this is close.
Kansas was #1 at1in 4000 something odds each year
Illinois was #2 at 1 in 12,000 something odds each year
Kentucky was #3 at 1 in 18,000 something odds each year
And the numbers keep going up from there. Also figure in that allot of those hunters sight there gun in the day before season and hunt one weekend a year. Also figure in that 80% shoot the firstbuck they see.
Kansas was #1 at1in 4000 something odds each year
Illinois was #2 at 1 in 12,000 something odds each year
Kentucky was #3 at 1 in 18,000 something odds each year
And the numbers keep going up from there. Also figure in that allot of those hunters sight there gun in the day before season and hunt one weekend a year. Also figure in that 80% shoot the firstbuck they see.
07-08-2008 | 10:25 PM
#46
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,318
Likes: 0
From: Norman OK USA
RE: Hunt By Numbers.
I think those coaster size nipples are getting out of control. However, I see a I like your logic... numbers don't lie. You're still the undisputed king of small deer in my book. Keep it up buddy, keep it up.
07-08-2008 | 11:13 PM
#47
Dominant Buck
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,199
Likes: 1
From: Blossvale, New York
RE: Hunt By Numbers.
God, I never thought I'd say this, but I long for the old days when threads were declared off topic and the author was given a stern warning. OH wait, that still happens for some. Ok, forget what I said.
07-08-2008 | 11:24 PM
#48
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,465
Likes: 0
From:
RE: Hunt By Numbers.
ORIGINAL: TEmbry
So what the king is trying to tell me, is that there are 7 to 8 3.5yo bucks on a 10,000 acre public hunting grounds, by his numbers. Hasn't his majesty himself hunted bigger tracts than this?
I thought these bucks don't exist in PA?
So what the king is trying to tell me, is that there are 7 to 8 3.5yo bucks on a 10,000 acre public hunting grounds, by his numbers. Hasn't his majesty himself hunted bigger tracts than this?
I thought these bucks don't exist in PA?
07-09-2008 | 05:28 AM
#50
Boone & Crockett
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 11,682
Likes: 0
From: Michigan/Ohio
RE: Hunt By Numbers.
ORIGINAL: Dubbya
I think those coaster size nipples are getting out of control. However, I see a I like your logic... numbers don't lie. You're still the undisputed king of small deer in my book. Keep it up buddy, keep it up.
I think those coaster size nipples are getting out of control. However, I see a I like your logic... numbers don't lie. You're still the undisputed king of small deer in my book. Keep it up buddy, keep it up.
