RE: Is there an argument for banning carbons for hunting?
 

There is more bull hockey in this thread than in the ole barn yard. I couldn't begin to list all the misinformation being spread or the facts being twisted to prove someones misinformation. The beginning premise has no validity and add to that things like "go to Vegas and see what they shoot". They shoot aluminums there because they're fatter and cut more lines, no other reason.

RE: Is there an argument for banning carbons for hunting?
 

TexasBowHunter,
I see what you mean. It did go in unfortunate directions. It wasn't my intent to start a "carbon vs aluminum" pea-ing match.

RE: Is there an argument for banning carbons for hunting?
 

Yeah, I feel bad stating that as a fact now. I am learning a lot from this website, I respect you guys. I will think a little more and gain a little more experience before I open my trap next time. It mush just be a coincidink that the guys that I noticed were shooting the aluminum arrows were all terrible shots. :)

RE: Is there an argument for banning carbons for hunting?
 

Its all good Swift!!;) These carbon/aluminum threads actually educate me on carbons being I don't know much about them.

Something good comes out of everything right??:D

RE: Is there an argument for banning carbons for hunting?
 

Definately, that's what this forum is for is to share, learn , and bond with your fellow hunters so that we can become better hunters. I am glad you uderstand! :)

RE: Is there an argument for banning carbons for hunting?
 

Itold you so.;):D:D:D