RE: NAP Razorback BH?
 

I knew I read that somewhere. Thanks 5Shot. I was tempted into trying this thing at one time but read your first review just in time. I had forgotten what it was and when I saw this head again I said, " that looks great" . BUT, somewhere I knew I had read something. I can see the composite breaking down like you said. As far as the rotating head, that' s a gimmick. Why would I need that. I' ll just stay with the 125 Thunderheads for now. Unlike Skeeter, the Thunderheads fly better for me and they' re sharper out of the box to me.

RE: NAP Razorback BH?
 

Thanks 5shot yet again!!!! I always read your reviews and trust your opinions. I have found exactly that in Bear and assumed that for moose it should apply as well. It seems I always get talked out of it by " so called" experts. I love to bow hunt and have been for a number of years, but in no way do I feel iIam an authority in equipment. So I tend to just stick with whats worked in the past and listen. Thankfully I can turn to people like yourself for more expert opinions and experience.

David, I found the Thunderheads and rockey mountains flew the best out of my previous bows. However for whatever reason the thunderheads didn' t quite fly as good as muzzy out of my current setup. My flight improved even more when I dropped to 100Gr and my current arrow length and style. I haven' t tried the 100Gr thunderheads to see and I may. I will agree the blades seem to be sharper in the thunder heads, but I like the overall design of the muzzy' s better. Theyboth preformed in game well, it just boiled down to confidence. Use what works the best and is proven personally, usually is the best motto. Thanks for your comments, as well.

RE: NAP Razorback BH?
 

Personally i use the Innerlocking ones and they are the strongest ones i have ever shot and they fly just like my field points.

RE: NAP Razorback BH?
 

Glad I could help. David, I agree with the rotating head being a gimmick. I would like to see new archery products get rid of the composit and " spinning" blades and just beef up the head. Thunderheads are a very fine broadhead, I know I had my doubts about them earlier until I did some more testing. They are a good bit sharper than Muzzys, but I have found both to shoot very well, infact I really can' t tell any accuracy differnce. To be fair to new archery products I will pick up a pack of the 125 grn razorbacks and try them out. who knows maybe they improved the heads?

RE: NAP Razorback BH?
 

I agree with 5shot on Magnus and Phantoms.

The Phantoms are 125gr and I am using 55/75 Gold Tip Camo XTs' . The broadheads group right with my field points at 20 yards(haven' t had a chance to check longer ranges yet).

I did break the back tab off of one of the Phantoms main blades but it was hit with another arrow so I guess that would be my fault.

The one thing that is great about the Phantoms' is that the steel real seems to hold and edge even after about 100 shots into foam target they are still fairly sharp.