antler restrictions, Your Fellings.
#1
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: centerville pa. USA
Posts: 105
antler restrictions, Your Fellings.
Last year was the first year for antler restrictions in the state of Pa. For most the restriction was 6 points to a side and for the rest of us it was 8 points to a side. Are large racks THE most important aspect of deer hunting?
#3
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Connellsville, PA
Posts: 840
RE: antler restrictions, Your Fellings.
Being a PA resident I feel that Alt made a great decision by making an antler restriction. Not only will it strengthen our deer herd but create healthier and larger bucks.
#4
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Acworth GA USA
Posts: 191
RE: antler restrictions, Your Fellings.
No large racks are not the only thing important, they are important though
GA has a 2 buck limit and now one of the 2 must have 4pts on one side or more. Many counties in GA also have antler restrictions above and beyond that regulation as part of the overall management of the GA herd.
For many years before the regs were in place, we (on lands I hunt) have limited ourselves on the size of bucks taken. Remember that this not only helps protect the younger bucks, but it causes more people to take does instead of young bucks, which in turn helps produce a healthier, more balanced herd.
Good move for PA.
Jim
GA has a 2 buck limit and now one of the 2 must have 4pts on one side or more. Many counties in GA also have antler restrictions above and beyond that regulation as part of the overall management of the GA herd.
For many years before the regs were in place, we (on lands I hunt) have limited ourselves on the size of bucks taken. Remember that this not only helps protect the younger bucks, but it causes more people to take does instead of young bucks, which in turn helps produce a healthier, more balanced herd.
Good move for PA.
Jim
#5
RE: antler restrictions, Your Fellings.
Well put huntingga!
This would seem to help take more Does! Me, I would want a bigger racked buck to shoot anyway! If I was hunting for meat I think I' d rather shoot a Doe! I feel most on here police themselves anyway![:-] If memory serves me correct while growing up in Michigan there was a Limit, above the ears or like 4" , don' t quote me though, that was a LONG time ago!
This would seem to help take more Does! Me, I would want a bigger racked buck to shoot anyway! If I was hunting for meat I think I' d rather shoot a Doe! I feel most on here police themselves anyway![:-] If memory serves me correct while growing up in Michigan there was a Limit, above the ears or like 4" , don' t quote me though, that was a LONG time ago!
#6
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: newville,PA.
Posts: 182
RE: antler restrictions, Your Fellings.
I' m also from PA and also think the antler restriction was a good thing and also combining both buck and doe season,more hunters are takeing more doe and makeing for a more balanced buck to doe ratio and letting the bucks to grow bigger for next season.
#8
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: centerville pa. USA
Posts: 105
RE: antler restrictions, Your Fellings.
Thanks for the input! The antler restrictions are to be a way of life until further notice but I don' t see them ever going back. It is extremely difficult to count points, I passed on 3 bucks inside bow range because I couldn' t tell if they were legal or not and passed on a 3x2 and a 2x2.
#9
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Brethren MI USA
Posts: 229
RE: antler restrictions, Your Fellings.
You guys from PA are pretty lucky...Michigan has the same restrictions as Georgia and it really makes no difference. In the norhter tip of the mit where I hunt you don' t see deer get big enough for the restriction to have any effect. Just think though PA residents, the season after next you will be seeing the rather large effects of the antler restriction.
#10
Typical Buck
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 716
RE: antler restrictions, Your Fellings.
If they planned to keep with and it WERE ' the way it' s done' where I was out, I' d be for it. But if they were just instituting it here and there for a year or 2 I' d think of it as just an inconvenience.