Wouldn't BH threads be more interesting....?
03-19-2008 | 07:12 PM
#31
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,796
Likes: 0
From:
RE: Wouldn't BH threads be more interesting....?
amount of equipment
LT
03-19-2008 | 07:13 PM
#32
Thread Starter
Dominant Buck
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 21,043
Likes: 0
From:
RE: Wouldn't BH threads be more interesting....?
Serious question Jeff;
What were you hoping to accomplish with this thread?
What were you hoping to accomplish with this thread?
Just thought it would be interesting if people had first hand knowedge of a product they were a detractor of.
It's one thing to talk up a product you feel strongly about and have personal knowledge and experience with. It's another to denounce one you've never even touched......much less used.
03-19-2008 | 07:16 PM
#33
Thread Starter
Dominant Buck
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 21,043
Likes: 0
From:
RE: Wouldn't BH threads be more interesting....?
It's not the amount of equipment that was used, but how many, if any, failures that were encountered during the time frame. Dead deer is dead deer. I agree. An equipment failure is also an equipment failure. Not saying your broadheads failed, but that they were only used for one season.
Jeff, I thought you said once that you were never going to get internet at home.
. Why is that important???
03-19-2008 | 07:19 PM
#34
Giant Nontypical
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 6,679
Likes: 0
From: Heaven is my home, temporarily residing in WNY :)
RE: Wouldn't BH threads be more interesting....?
Jeff ...if a guy is not comfortable with the broadheads YOU use because he likes a fix blade head ....... that's HIS choice and opinion ...... it's like you and the whisker bisquit .....
03-19-2008 | 07:22 PM
#35
Giant Nontypical
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,684
Likes: 0
From: Jefferson County, Missouri
RE: Wouldn't BH threads be more interesting....?
ORIGINAL: GMMAT
Dan I think it has merit. I posted a while back....asking what percentage of BH's we thought actually saw the insides of an animal. We get people denouncing BH's all the time.....adamantly....and if the truth be known....they've probably never used the head they're talking down.
Just thought it would be interesting if people had first hand knowedge of a product they were a detractor of.
It's one thing to talk up a product you feel strongly about and have personal knowledge and experience with. It's another to denounce one you've never even touched......much less used.
Serious question Jeff;
What were you hoping to accomplish with this thread?
What were you hoping to accomplish with this thread?
Just thought it would be interesting if people had first hand knowedge of a product they were a detractor of.
It's one thing to talk up a product you feel strongly about and have personal knowledge and experience with. It's another to denounce one you've never even touched......much less used.
anyone else catch this key word here
03-19-2008 | 07:22 PM
#36
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,882
Likes: 0
From: Virginia
RE: Wouldn't BH threads be more interesting....?
Jeff ...if a guy is not comfortable with the broadheads YOU use because he likes a fix blade head ....... that's HIS choice and opinion ...... it's like you and the whisker bisquit .....
sorry to speak for you Jeff... im bored too
03-19-2008 | 07:22 PM
#37
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,796
Likes: 0
From:
RE: Wouldn't BH threads be more interesting....?
OK, read slow
If I (analogy) go buy x car because I drove one for about four months and had very little if any failures with said car, should Joe Blow go and buy this car and expect to never have it fail him. I know, I know, every car/broadhead can fail. That is not the issue here. The issue is, "how much experience does it take" with a said piece of equip/broadhead, before we are entitled to say they are the best, great, excellent, ect.
LT
If I (analogy) go buy x car because I drove one for about four months and had very little if any failures with said car, should Joe Blow go and buy this car and expect to never have it fail him. I know, I know, every car/broadhead can fail. That is not the issue here. The issue is, "how much experience does it take" with a said piece of equip/broadhead, before we are entitled to say they are the best, great, excellent, ect.
LT
03-19-2008 | 07:26 PM
#38
Thread Starter
Dominant Buck
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 21,043
Likes: 0
From:
RE: Wouldn't BH threads be more interesting....?
Jeff ...if a guy is not comfortable with the broadheads YOU use because he likes a fix blade head ....... that's HIS choice and opinion ...... it's like you and the whisker bisquit .....
I don't CARE what anyone uses. I'll give you a testimonial if I've used a product....but I sure as hell am not gonna denounce a product I've never used......to make the item I DO use seem "better".
03-19-2008 | 07:26 PM
#39
Giant Nontypical
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 6,679
Likes: 0
From: Heaven is my home, temporarily residing in WNY :)
RE: Wouldn't BH threads be more interesting....?
ORIGINAL: buckmaster
I think it just rubs him wrong when people put them down without ever havinh touched one.
sorry to speak for you Jeff... im bored too
Jeff ...if a guy is not comfortable with the broadheads YOU use because he likes a fix blade head ....... that's HIS choice and opinion ...... it's like you and the whisker bisquit .....
sorry to speak for you Jeff... im bored too
03-19-2008 | 07:27 PM
#40
Thread Starter
Dominant Buck
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 21,043
Likes: 0
From:
RE: Wouldn't BH threads be more interesting....?
OK LT,,,,,,,I'll type slow.
We'll use your car....if that helps.
Man drives 100,000 miles in 5 years. Car performs flawlessly.
Man drives 100,000 miles in one year. Car performs flawlessly.
What's the difference?
We'll use your car....if that helps.
Man drives 100,000 miles in 5 years. Car performs flawlessly.
Man drives 100,000 miles in one year. Car performs flawlessly.
What's the difference?