![]() |
RE: For or Against Mandatory Bowhunter Education
Magic....you're cool!
I'm am neither for government nor am I against government. I try to apply commonsense under all conditions. but if you tell me I have to ...we do this all the time. That's a part of living within a society. Mez talks about driver's licenses, for example.I know I singing to the choir... What am I going to do...I've applied with the Colorado Division of Wildlife to become a volunteer instructor( I love my sport that much). I was accepted and havea class of students already under my belt-all since January 1st. It would be nice to see more of the same... |
RE: For or Against Mandatory Bowhunter Education
A college education is good...is it mandatory to get one? Do I have faith in my fellow Americans? Hmmm....From my office window, I just watched a man empty all the trash from his vehicle onto the roadway. I guess we should mandate against littering highways. excuse me while I go clean up his mess...yeah, I have tons of faith. |
RE: For or Against Mandatory Bowhunter Education
ORIGINAL: iamyourhuckleberry A college education is good...is it mandatory to get one? Yes, I do think this is the land of the free...or at least it shouldbe, otherwise our national anthem is a lie. Notice how I qualified my statements by saying that in civil society there ought to be a line drawn well short of anarchy. In civil society(which I support) we do not travel to Colorado to kill elk out of season. |
RE: For or Against Mandatory Bowhunter Education
And in civilized societies me make changes to the rules if the rules do not appear to be working... Sometimes a mandate is the best way to implement a changein the rules.
Educating bowhunters has nothing to do with educating college students. |
RE: For or Against Mandatory Bowhunter Education
ORIGINAL: iamyourhuckleberry And in civilized societies me make changes to the rules if the rules do not appear to be working... Whew! Good thing we live in a civilized society. |
RE: For or Against Mandatory Bowhunter Education
So then Badger, what would you have us do? Do you concede that a problem exists?If so, how do we fix it? Your concept of don't meddle in my affairs isn't working.
|
RE: For or Against Mandatory Bowhunter Education
Generally, anytime something comes along that may protect one idiot from harming himself and costing the american taxpayer tens of thousands of dollars - I'm all for it.
From a $$$ and sense perspective: Look at the people who bowhunt. These aren't your white-collar highbrow types- they're po' folks from the patchtowns, trailer parks and backwoods. They don't have $50,000 laying around to pay for a major orthopedic injury. So what happens when they maim themselves? If they're lucky enough to have insurance - the insurer foots the bill and the costs are diluted throughout the insurance system. End result: Working folks pay. If they have NO insurance? The burden falls squarely on the shoulders of Uncle Sam, and we all pay. That sucks. Furthermore: Barrier to entry = Less bowhunters = good thing. Since it serves as a barrier to entry of the sport, it helps keep the number of bowhunters at a minimum.I don't know about you guys, but when I pull up to the farm gate and seefour other vehicles parked there, I'm not exactly doing cartwheels. There's just getting to be too many damn people bowhunting. They're driving up lease prices, ramping up the pressure on public land - and all that is putting the squeeze on guys like me, who have been bowhunting (largely undisturbed) for god knows how long. Greedy? Sure. I don't care. At least I'm up front about it. LOL So anytime I can do my part and eliminate the competition, I do it. Joe Schmoe can take up fishing or maybe stay home and watch porno and NASCAR. As long as he's not out there crampin' my style while I'm tryin' to get my bowhunt on, I don't care what the hell he does. By encouraging people to bowhunt, or making it an "easy" hobby to take up - we're only cutting our own throats. Thus, I like as many barriers to entry as possible - but that's just me looking out for #1. Big conflicts of interest out there... Lots of pros/cons. |
RE: For or Against Mandatory Bowhunter Education
ORIGINAL: iamyourhuckleberry So then Badger, what would you have us do? Do you concede that a problem exists?If so, how do we fix it? I never said that educating bowhunters had something todo with educating college students. I wasmerely pointing out thatthe suggestion thateducation is good, therefore we should make itmandatory, is not very solid. For example: military service is good...should we make it mandatory? college is good...should we make it mandatory? having a job is good...should we make it mandatory? reading to your kids is good...should we make it mandatory? Donating time to help at a homeless shelter is good...should we make it mandatory? Being a good mentor and taking kids hunting/fishing is good...should we make it mandatory? There are lots of good things that are not mandatory. Suggesting thatsince something is simply good, we should make it mandatory in order to impose the goodness on everyone is a pretty lame argument (see my examples above). That's all I was saying there. A simple analogy. What would YOU have us do? |
RE: For or Against Mandatory Bowhunter Education
Here is what I could wholeheartedly support. Inclusion of more bowhunting material in the already existing hunters ed classes we have now. Because, well bowhunting is hunting and should fall under hunters ed classes.
|
RE: For or Against Mandatory Bowhunter Education
ORIGINAL: Badger_Girl93 ORIGINAL: magicman54494 I'm a little blown away by this thread. It seems like everyone is fighting yet we are all in agreement? I believe it was sign who quoted that we all agree that education is good. If that is true then the question becomes: What is the most efficient way of getting our new brothers and sisters that education? It is my belief that the most efficient, cost effective way to do it is to coordinate at a state level. Only if you want to operate a lawn mower. ORIGINAL: magicman54494 The comp system for licensing keeps track of everything. It makes buying a license quick and easy. I am a land owner and am tired of the gov. telling me I can't do this or I have to do that. If anyone can impliment a system that is better I am all for it! If someone else sets it up then we have to live by their rules. Is that any different than the state? My point is I don't always agree with gov. intervention and I can understand why others may fight against this for that reason. But it is my belief that in this case we are using the gov. for the benefit of hunting. I was trying to see this from your side. I wish you would make that same effort. ORIGINAL: magicman54494 What I see here is a warped thought process. Yes I agree we should get an education but if you tell me I have to do it then I will oppose you. Weigh the positive effects againts the negatives. Are there any negative effects to the state getting our new hunters an education? here in wis you can take a combo. class gun & bow and get cert. in both at once. Search your hearts. Is it possible that some of you are just anti gov? And are in opposition just because it is the gov. And for those of you that argue that this will lead to more gov. involvement in our lives, remember WE are the gov. and have the right to decide on all laws and rules. If I follow your line of thought then we should have no laws and everyone should be able to do anything we want. How do you think that would work? This statement shows me that you have some deep seated hatred toward gov. in general. Maybe you should get involved to change the things you don't like. In civilized society, there is obviously a line to be drawn somewhere well short of anarchy. So your suggestion that those opposed to mandatory BE are in favor of a lawless land is pretty disingenuous. I am not going to discuss this topic with you any further. Lets just agree to disagree. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:48 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.