[Deleted]
#4
Sounds pretty unethical to me even with the head shots. Unless I am reading this way wrong I think it is pretty stupid. Find other ways to diminish the deer population.
#5
you figure they would just let people bowhunt that township property that you can't hunt that is so abundant with deer instead they rather spend conservation dollars on hitmen
#6
So called sharpshooters.Our local city idiots brought in some company to lower the herd in a 530ac park. Not sure of the cost.Hunters would have paid them just for a place to hunt.[:@]
#9
ORIGINAL: Sliverflicker
What a shame, I have never understood the logic of bringing in out of town piad hunters.
What a shame, I have never understood the logic of bringing in out of town piad hunters.
The bottom line is these people don't want the deer eating their $10K in landscaping or wrapping themselves around the hood of their precious BMW, but at the same time God forbid they let a hard working man on their property to try to hunt for deer. Little Billy might actually take an interest in what the hunter is doing and want to try it. Next thing you know Billy's neck will turn red and he'll grow a mullet (their thinking not mine). So, they'll pay big bucks to bring in these companies to get rid of the deer. When it all comes down to it they don't care how these guys do it, ethically, unethically, whatever, as long as they don't have to see it and the deer are gone they are happy.[:@]
#10
Come on over to westchester or putnam county. The word infested comes to mind.
ORIGINAL: Kamil
theres not enough deer in ny as is but i have heard of them as i hunt in new jersey 95 % of the time
theres not enough deer in ny as is but i have heard of them as i hunt in new jersey 95 % of the time



