![]() |
RE: What is your view on Outfitters?
ORIGINAL: THWACK_007 PUBLIC LAND!!!!! If you need somewhere to hunt that you dont have to lease! Plus my tax money is helping pay for YOU a place to hunt. Since all of these a$$hole landowners are trying to make a little extra money and pay for their land then I guess you can go to PUBLIC LAND and hunt. What kind of landowner is dumb enough to try to pay for his land anyways?? Geeeez!!! Come on people..get real! I mean whos fault is it that the landowner leased his/her land....the landowner or the outfitter/hunters? |
RE: What is your view on Outfitters?
ORIGINAL: Cougar Mag I have a question. While I realize much of Shawnee National Forest is privately owned, I've heard rumors the state of Illinois leases some of Shawnee National Forest's public land to a few outfitters. Is this true? |
RE: What is your view on Outfitters?
Actually, none of the Shawnee National Forest is privately owned. And, it is owned by the Federal Government not the State, so i find it hard to believe that any of it gets leased out by the State. |
RE: What is your view on Outfitters?
ORIGINAL: THWACK_007 PUBLIC LAND!!!!! If you need somewhere to hunt that you dont have to lease! Plus my tax money is helping pay for YOU a place to hunt. Since all of these a$$hole landowners are trying to make a little extra money and pay for their land then I guess you can go to PUBLIC LAND and hunt. What kind of landowner is dumb enough to try to pay for his land anyways?? Geeeez!!! Come on people..get real! I mean whos fault is it that the landowner leased his/her land....the landowner or the outfitter/hunters? People like you... you just don't understand anything. There's no sense in even talking to you about it. |
RE: What is your view on Outfitters?
Dont care for them. The w h o r e out the land and animals for top dollar, leaving the land and animals in bad shap. Then move on. I had outfitters ruin one of my properties. They leased land next to mine and raped it, until it was out of animals, then moved on. It took more than 8 years before I started seeing animals agian. That was after they gave up the lease next to my land. They had clients out 7 days a week. Thats a lot of deer for one area. They didnt care, they leased it, and when the animals were gone, they gave up the lease and moved to the next streach of land. Im see that very problem around me right now with all the goose outfitters. Use to be thousands up on thousands of birds around here. Now you are lucky to see a few. The outfitters have just about drivin them out of this county.
|
RE: What is your view on Outfitters?
we run coyote dogs all over this part of IL, and I can't tell you how many outfitted properties we have permission to coyote hunt that we find dead bucks on.......with the heads cut off!! It's sad. There is an investigation going on....short fruitless one.....pointing towards outfitters that dumped a half dozen dead headless bucks in the local gas station dumpster!!! I don't like the idea of hunting becoming a big money industry, but if they are doing it LEGALLY....why not.
|
RE: What is your view on Outfitters?
ORIGINAL: Cougar Mag Actually, none of the Shawnee National Forest is privately owned. And, it is owned by the Federal Government not the State, so i find it hard to believe that any of it gets leased out by the State. Actually, there are lots of pieces of private property that are completely surrounded by National Forest Land. I think that is what is confusing the issue here. I never meant to imply that the National Forest was one contiguous piece of ground.By definition, if it is National Forest Land, it is public, not private. The point is, the parcels that aremarked on your map as private property are not part of the National Forest,therefore i stand by my statement that NONE of the Shawnee National Forest is private property. ;) |
RE: What is your view on Outfitters?
Actually, there are lots of pieces of private property that are completely surrounded by National Forest Land. I think that is what is confusing the issue here. I never meant to imply that the National Forest was one contiguous piece of ground. By definition, if it is National Forest Land, it is public, not private. Therefore i stand by my statement that NONE of the Shawnee National Forest is private property. |
RE: What is your view on Outfitters?
Cougar, not to get off topic, but just noticed that you're from SE central, IL. Around where at in central Illinois? Im from Paris. (Edgar county)
|
RE: What is your view on Outfitters?
Cougar, not to get off topic, but just noticed that you're from SE central, IL. Around where at in central Illinois? Im from Paris. (Edgar county) |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:23 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.