Another ethics / legal question
#31
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,394
RE: Another ethics / legal question
I guess I should add the reasons I hunt does and bucks;
My first priority for a buck is his antlers, second is the meat.
My first priority for a doe is the meat, followed by managing the herd.
So to support my position above, I've still accomplished one of each of the goals set forth for both does and bucks.
KP
My first priority for a buck is his antlers, second is the meat.
My first priority for a doe is the meat, followed by managing the herd.
So to support my position above, I've still accomplished one of each of the goals set forth for both does and bucks.
KP
#32
RE: Another ethics / legal question
VA DNR states:
All hunters killing a bear, deer, or turkey, unless the hunter is license exempt, are required to validate an appropriate tag on their bear-deer-turkey license (big game license), bonus deer permit, or special permit (DCAP, DMAP) at the place of kill prior to moving the animal in any way. To validate a tag, successful hunters must completely remove the designated notch area from the appropriate license or permit tag.
All hunters killing a bear, deer, or turkey, unless the hunter is license exempt, are required to validate an appropriate tag on their bear-deer-turkey license (big game license), bonus deer permit, or special permit (DCAP, DMAP) at the place of kill prior to moving the animal in any way. To validate a tag, successful hunters must completely remove the designated notch area from the appropriate license or permit tag.
#33
RE: Another ethics / legal question
ORIGINAL: ducsauce
What I infer from this is, if game is unrecoverable or eaten by predators, then NO tag is required (It did not specify). If its a P/Y then I'll tag it and take the antlers. If its a doe then I'll chalk it up as a loss. Simple as that.
VA DNR states:
All hunters killing a bear, deer, or turkey, unless the hunter is license exempt, are required to validate an appropriate tag on their bear-deer-turkey license (big game license), bonus deer permit, or special permit (DCAP, DMAP) at the place of kill prior to moving the animal in any way. To validate a tag, successful hunters must completely remove the designated notch area from the appropriate license or permit tag.
All hunters killing a bear, deer, or turkey, unless the hunter is license exempt, are required to validate an appropriate tag on their bear-deer-turkey license (big game license), bonus deer permit, or special permit (DCAP, DMAP) at the place of kill prior to moving the animal in any way. To validate a tag, successful hunters must completely remove the designated notch area from the appropriate license or permit tag.
#34
RE: Another ethics / legal question
ORIGINAL: brucelanthier
So you are allowed to shoot the animals and, if you don't move them, then you don't have to tag them? You can shoot 10 deer, let them rotby not moving them and not tag any of them and its not against law? You would only be breaking the law if you took it home (moved it)and did not tag it?
ORIGINAL: ducsauce
What I infer from this is, if game is unrecoverable or eaten by predators, then NO tag is required (It did not specify). If its a P/Y then I'll tag it and take the antlers. If its a doe then I'll chalk it up as a loss. Simple as that.
VA DNR states:
All hunters killing a bear, deer, or turkey, unless the hunter is license exempt, are required to validate an appropriate tag on their bear-deer-turkey license (big game license), bonus deer permit, or special permit (DCAP, DMAP) at the place of kill prior to moving the animal in any way. To validate a tag, successful hunters must completely remove the designated notch area from the appropriate license or permit tag.
All hunters killing a bear, deer, or turkey, unless the hunter is license exempt, are required to validate an appropriate tag on their bear-deer-turkey license (big game license), bonus deer permit, or special permit (DCAP, DMAP) at the place of kill prior to moving the animal in any way. To validate a tag, successful hunters must completely remove the designated notch area from the appropriate license or permit tag.
BTW, That's exactly how its worded.
#36
RE: Another ethics / legal question
Had a bowhunter post a similar scenario on another site; He shot a doe and it ran into the swamp. He immediately tracked the deer only to see her walking away inside the mouth of a black bear. Don't think he tagged her. Most states have allowances for predator loss, if there are predators in the area. If the CO doesn't require a tag MY ETHICS would say no.
BTW for the Noah Webster poster
in·teg·ri·ty
(n-tgr-t)
n.
1. Steadfast adherence to a strict moral or ethical code
This would qualify. I would be adhering to a strict code: MINE!, not yours.
BTW for the Noah Webster poster
in·teg·ri·ty
(n-tgr-t)
n.
1. Steadfast adherence to a strict moral or ethical code
This would qualify. I would be adhering to a strict code: MINE!, not yours.
#37
RE: Another ethics / legal question
Regarding the VA regs, here is what VA says about wounding deer (and it's only required to tag deer killed by the hunter, not deer that are "probably killed" by the hunter or wounded by the hunter and then killed by coyotes, etc.):
"It is unlawful to...kill or cripple and knowingly allow any non-migratory game bird or game animal to be wasted without making a reasonable effort to retrieve the animal and retain it in possession."
All of that said, my ethics are not dictated by what's legal. It was legal to exterminate Jews in Nazi Germany, but that doesn't make it ethical. And, likewise, just because it's illegal doesn't make it unethical. My parents let me drink a small glass of wine with Thanksgiving dinner whenI was technically under the legal drinking age. I don't think that was unethical. Others may disagree, but that's ethics for ya...just like bellybuttons, everyone's got em and each one's unique. I respect just about anyone who takes the time to really think through an ethical issue honestly and then acts according to what they think is right, not just what's convenient/advantageous.
For me, the tag is my exchange and record for bringing something physicallyout of the woods, meat or antlers. If a wild animal ends up getting the meat and I don't get anything, then what happens in the forest stays in the forest! The coyotes got my deer instead of another animal.
Given the number of tags we get in VA, for me it really has nothing to dowith using up a tag. We get two either-sex and four antlerless tags, plus you can get an essentially unlimitednumber of damage tags if you're a farmer, etc., and have a deer problem. I only bow hunt and have never used all of my tags, so that really is not the issue.
#39
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location:
Posts: 32
RE: Another ethics / legal question
i don't understand what the differance is in ethics with taging or not taging a doe a tag is there to report deers your taking so that police and gamewarden can tell your not poaching now i don't see how not tagging a doe is unethical because the nothing changes about the doe its still going to rot. I think this is more a question of beinglegal