Can a bow penetrate better than a rifle
#1
Guest
Posts: n/a
Hey, I am having a discussion in the guns forum about arrow penetration vs. 3006 penetration. Have you guys ever seen the demonstration of shooting thru a bucket of sand with a bow and then with a rifle? I saw it a few years ago at the outdoor shows. Never tried it myself, but there are some doubting toms on the guns page. Tell me if I lied.
#3
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 0
From: Warren PA USA
I saw it a my hunter education course. The arrow goes through, but the bullet only goes in. It's all physics...mass in relation to target densities and speed of project tile.......etc.
Arrows penetrated and the bullets exploded!
Arrows penetrated and the bullets exploded!
#6
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 447
Likes: 0
From: memphis TN
I believe the bullet is a more efficient dumper of its energy into the target. That is why a deer will sometimes not know it has been shot on a pass-through. The arrow's shock to the animal is often not very high if no bone is encountered. A bullet uses shock to kill(as well as destruction of tissue), whereas an arrow uses the cutting and bleeding to kill. Just my thoughts.
The most important bloodtrail leads right to the foot of the cross
The most important bloodtrail leads right to the foot of the cross
#8
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
From: Winthrop NY USA
Comndr45 has it. Through soft flesh the arrow will pass right through (although a bullet probably will also). But the bullet is designed to release it's energy in the animal. So yes, through tissue, an arrow probably has better penetration, but probably not better killing power.
#10
Spike
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: Texas
This can be tested by using two milk jugs filled with water, shoot one with a gun and the other with an arrow. The bullet explodes the jug, the shock effect and the arrow pass through allowing the water to leak out, the bleeding effect.
[quote]
I believe the bullet is a more efficient dumper of its energy into the target. That is why a deer will sometimes not know it has been shot on a pass-through. The arrow's shock to the animal is often not very high if no bone is encountered. A bullet uses shock to kill(as well as destruction of tissue), whereas an arrow uses the cutting and bleeding to kill. Just my thoughts./quote]
[quote]
I believe the bullet is a more efficient dumper of its energy into the target. That is why a deer will sometimes not know it has been shot on a pass-through. The arrow's shock to the animal is often not very high if no bone is encountered. A bullet uses shock to kill(as well as destruction of tissue), whereas an arrow uses the cutting and bleeding to kill. Just my thoughts./quote]


