Next World Record?
--any place besides minnesota[&o]
05-08-2007 | 12:47 PM
#42
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,911
Likes: 0
From: Minnesota
RE: Next World Record?
Based on the last P&Y issue I looked at, it would have to be Saskatchewan (sp), Iowa, Minnesota, or KS...
I'm surprised you don't here more about Minnesota.. They had something like 3 in the top 10 P&Y's for that issue... Big deer, 160+......
I'm surprised you don't here more about Minnesota.. They had something like 3 in the top 10 P&Y's for that issue... Big deer, 160+......
05-08-2007 | 04:34 PM
#44
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,552
Likes: 0
From: Normal, IL
RE: Next World Record?
Id deffiently have to say either Illinois, Iowa or Kansas. There are way to many big deer taken in any of the three states every year for a new world record not to happen sooner or later.
05-08-2007 | 05:54 PM
#45
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 0
From: KY
RE: Next World Record?
I have a feeling someones gona kill a deer in KY that really blows people's minds this season. Everyone looks at the Western part of the state, but Ithink it will come out of Henry or Oldham. Or Germ will kill the state record in September...one or the other.
05-08-2007 | 05:55 PM
#46
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
From:
RE: Next World Record?
central alberta, seen some monster 190-210 plus typicals. In my secret spot none the less. the saft buck which was denied the world record was shot 3 miles from my place and i have talked to him as well. keeping my fingers crossed lol
05-08-2007 | 06:09 PM
#47
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,519
Likes: 0
From: Eureka, MO
RE: Next World Record?
Missouri...Prolly Northern Missouri, but we do have the largest whitetail on record, but it died of natural causes. If that big boy got some of his genes around before he died there might be some potential here.
05-08-2007 | 06:38 PM
#48
Thread Starter
Giant Nontypical
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,368
Likes: 0
From: Mont County, Pa
RE: Next World Record?
I guess it's my turn. I have to say central Alberta (Bow Zone) as well, although I am partial to this region.
Someone previously said they didn't think Alberta would come through because of the lack of bowhunters. That's exactly why I think this is the spot. This 1600 square miles ( not a typo) of near perfect Whitetailhabitat hasn't had gun hunting since the mid 70's and has very little pressure, allowing these bucks to growHUGE racks. Giant bucks die of old age in parts of this area.
As Mitch said, Wayne Zaft's buck shows what this region is all about.
Someone previously said they didn't think Alberta would come through because of the lack of bowhunters. That's exactly why I think this is the spot. This 1600 square miles ( not a typo) of near perfect Whitetailhabitat hasn't had gun hunting since the mid 70's and has very little pressure, allowing these bucks to growHUGE racks. Giant bucks die of old age in parts of this area.As Mitch said, Wayne Zaft's buck shows what this region is all about.
05-08-2007 | 07:02 PM
#49
Typical Buck
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 963
Likes: 0
From: Northern IL&Southern IL
RE: Next World Record?
ORIGINAL: MOmightymite
Missouri...Prolly Northern Missouri, but we do have the largest whitetail on record, but it died of natural causes. If that big boy got some of his genes around before he died there might be some potential here.
Missouri...Prolly Northern Missouri, but we do have the largest whitetail on record, but it died of natural causes. If that big boy got some of his genes around before he died there might be some potential here.
