Bowhunter/Hunter Pride

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

01-27-2007 | 07:28 AM

#21

hardcorehunter

Thread Starter

Banned

Joined: Apr 2006

Posts: 7,145

Likes: 0

From: IOWA/25' UP

RE: Bowhunter/Hunter Pride

Quote:

ORIGINAL: Dr Andy

Don, ins. co. stats are used by the DNR in many areas to help determine seasons and limits ,see my post above!

Thanks for posting Dr. I hadn't seen this. You are correct.

01-27-2007 | 08:41 AM

#22

Elkcrazy8

Nontypical Buck

Joined: Dec 2003

Posts: 2,072

Likes: 0

From: Idaho

RE: Bowhunter/Hunter Pride

01-27-2007 | 08:44 AM

#23

jmbuckhunter

Nontypical Buck

Joined: Jul 2006

Posts: 4,487

Likes: 0

From: St. Louis, MO

RE: Bowhunter/Hunter Pride

I know in MO a few years back they started allowing unlimited doe archery tags in St. louis, Co. the area around Kansas City and Columbia just to reduce the numbers. It was a success so now in most of the state you can killas many does with a bow as you want. A lot of the data used in the studies for this project came from Ins. companies. They definatelydo have a say in hunting issues.

01-27-2007 | 08:49 AM

#24

davidmil

Dominant Buck

Joined: Feb 2003

Posts: 21,199

Likes: 1

From: Blossvale, New York

RE: Bowhunter Pride

Well of course I'm wrong now that you edited you original post. As you stated it originally, I believe I was right on. Insurance companies do base rates on claims and desired dividends for stockholders. Originally you made it sound like we the bowhunters are the salvation of insurance companies and the only ones doing anything about it. It sounded as if it weren't for us the world would come to an end.

01-27-2007 | 08:55 AM

#25

Elkcrazy8

Nontypical Buck

Joined: Dec 2003

Posts: 2,072

Likes: 0

From: Idaho

RE: Bowhunter Pride

If it weren't for bowhunting, I think I would come to an end!!

01-27-2007 | 08:56 AM

#26

hardcorehunter

Thread Starter

Banned

Joined: Apr 2006

Posts: 7,145

Likes: 0

From: IOWA/25' UP

RE: Bowhunter Pride

Quote:

ORIGINAL: davidmil

Well of course I'm wrong now that you edited you original post. As you stated it originally, I believe I was right on. Insurance companies do base rates on claims and desired dividends for stockholders. Originally you made it sound like we the bowhunters are the salvation of insurance companies and the only ones doing anything about it. It sounded as if it weren't for us the world would come to an end.

Thethread title on thefront page when you posted last night said Bowhunter/Hunter. I added the word "hunter" as soon as Dan caught it, well before you posted. I only edited my post this am by adding one word to include the word "Hunter." How does adding the one word "hunter" all of a sudden make me right today and wrong last night? So wrong that you insulted me by sayingI was obviously "smoking something"