![]() |
RE: Site Performance?
It is definetly faster than it was. Good job
|
RE: Site Performance?
It took me forever to get in! I kept trying my password and it wouldn't let me use it, but it's been doing that to me, it's happened a couple of times in the last few weeks... so I dunno.
We'll see how things go, seems to be more efficient. |
RE: Site Performance?
Just got timed out trying to respond. Really bad here. Timed out 3 times in 5 minutes. Sorry Justin it ain't fixed.
|
RE: Site Performance?
Much much improved here. Loads in a snap like it should. Good job. so far...:D
|
RE: Site Performance?
ORIGINAL: statjunk Some times quicker than before other times the same as before. Tom |
RE: Site Performance?
Haven't seen much diff.
|
RE: Site Performance?
ORIGINAL: Rickmur ORIGINAL: statjunk Some times quicker than before other times the same as before. Tom Bobby |
RE: Site Performance?
ORIGINAL: 121553 ORIGINAL: Rickmur ORIGINAL: statjunk Some times quicker than before other times the same as before. Tom Bobby |
RE: Site Performance?
seems the same or slower to me, but like my old buddy TDWW says
My mind works in ways that can't be understood. I just got a bigger motor. With endless possibilities. It's breathtaking to watch but I also know it will ultimately, be my ruin. ;) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() j/k seems to be doing better for me;) |
RE: Site Performance?
I think its faster in page loads, except when posting a reply. Then its about the same as before.
ShawneeSlinger |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:25 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.