What digital game camera are you using?
07-19-2006, 08:59 AM
#1
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 842
What digital game camera are you using?
Hey folks! There's been a lot of threads with guys posting their digital game camera pics.
My two home-brew 35mm jobs have sort of bit the dust and I have grown tired of getting the film developed.
Please tell us what camera make and model (include how many megapixels) you're using and post a sample pic!
Thanks!
Chris
My two home-brew 35mm jobs have sort of bit the dust and I have grown tired of getting the film developed.
Please tell us what camera make and model (include how many megapixels) you're using and post a sample pic!
Thanks!
Chris
07-19-2006, 09:57 AM
#3
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Central Minnesota
Posts: 676
RE: What digital game camera are you using?
Wildview Digital 2.0.
Pros: 2.0 megapixels is enough for me. Price is right at $99 (another $30 for memory card and another $40 for rechargeable batteries/charger).
Cons: Shudder speed is slow. But not sobad if you have it at a mineral site or throw some corn out to top them to say cheese.
Pros: 2.0 megapixels is enough for me. Price is right at $99 (another $30 for memory card and another $40 for rechargeable batteries/charger).
Cons: Shudder speed is slow. But not sobad if you have it at a mineral site or throw some corn out to top them to say cheese.
07-19-2006, 12:08 PM
#9
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Brampton Ontario Canada
Posts: 1,038
RE: What digital game camera are you using?
Geeze--that's a difficult question.
Of all the trail cameras I've used--for the price the Moultrie Game Spy 200, itdoes a reasonable job. The Cuddeback 3.0 produces good pictures--but somehow the older 3.0 MP isn't as sensitive as some say. I'm now testing the New Bushnell 3.0 MP 11-9930 IR, the sensitivity is excellent--very fast--hopefully this model doesn't fill itself with WATER like its predecessor. I'm also testing the New Cuddeback NoFlash--so far it's been a disappointment--I'm still fiddling with the settings, hopefully something changes for the better.
Of all the trail cameras I've used--for the price the Moultrie Game Spy 200, itdoes a reasonable job. The Cuddeback 3.0 produces good pictures--but somehow the older 3.0 MP isn't as sensitive as some say. I'm now testing the New Bushnell 3.0 MP 11-9930 IR, the sensitivity is excellent--very fast--hopefully this model doesn't fill itself with WATER like its predecessor. I'm also testing the New Cuddeback NoFlash--so far it's been a disappointment--I'm still fiddling with the settings, hopefully something changes for the better.