another maryland monster
#21
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 801
Likes: 0
For the guy who thinks that is a photoshop work, have you ever worked with the program? I can assure you that is not photoshop work, the main reason is the shadowing from the nearest antler on the rear. Since the flash is set slightly higher than the optics you get just a hint of shadow, and it is perfect, on the back antler. Plus, look at the red in the berries on the back tree. If someone was to "doctor" a photo of deer antler seen in a trail cam, and they would NEVER go through the effort in a pic like this as it would require way to much effort, the backgroud andshadows in this very clear photo would show it.
That buck looks like he's still got some growing to do, he'd have me on high alert for an entire season that's for sure. Thanks for sharing.
That buck looks like he's still got some growing to do, he'd have me on high alert for an entire season that's for sure. Thanks for sharing.
#22
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 913
Likes: 0
From: North Carolina
ORIGINAL: ShadowAce
Sorry brother, but upon further review, there is no way the tines on the opposite side, through the near side tines would be that bright just from the camera flash. Not normally a skeptic but...
Sorry brother, but upon further review, there is no way the tines on the opposite side, through the near side tines would be that bright just from the camera flash. Not normally a skeptic but...
#23
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 689
Likes: 0
From: Hagerstown, MD
Quit showing pictures of our big MD bucks, pretty soon we will be like IL and every Tom Dick and Harry in the country will be hunting here....
Great buck but thats the only big buck in this state so dont get any ideas!!!

Great buck but thats the only big buck in this state so dont get any ideas!!!
#26
ORIGINAL: MA Jay
For the guy who thinks that is a photoshop work, have you ever worked with the program? I can assure you that is not photoshop work, the main reason is the shadowing from the nearest antler on the rear. Since the flash is set slightly higher than the optics you get just a hint of shadow, and it is perfect, on the back antler. Plus, look at the red in the berries on the back tree. If someone was to "doctor" a photo of deer antler seen in a trail cam, and they would NEVER go through the effort in a pic like this as it would require way to much effort, the backgroud andshadows in this very clear photo would show it.
That buck looks like he's still got some growing to do, he'd have me on high alert for an entire season that's for sure. Thanks for sharing.
For the guy who thinks that is a photoshop work, have you ever worked with the program? I can assure you that is not photoshop work, the main reason is the shadowing from the nearest antler on the rear. Since the flash is set slightly higher than the optics you get just a hint of shadow, and it is perfect, on the back antler. Plus, look at the red in the berries on the back tree. If someone was to "doctor" a photo of deer antler seen in a trail cam, and they would NEVER go through the effort in a pic like this as it would require way to much effort, the backgroud andshadows in this very clear photo would show it.
That buck looks like he's still got some growing to do, he'd have me on high alert for an entire season that's for sure. Thanks for sharing.
Another awsome buck Madeline!!


