pls explain - why not this shot
11-29-2005 | 07:21 AM
#21
Giant Nontypical
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 7,571
Likes: 0
From:
RE: pls explain - why not this shot
Bob you lost me on the target coment, I understand it is game but doesnt it still have a target in the side of it (i.e behind the shoulder,4th rib).
Quartering away is a very HIGH percentage single lung shot also
11-29-2005 | 09:30 AM
#22
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,701
Likes: 0
From: Wadena, MN
RE: pls explain - why not this shot
That could be true depending at the angle which I guess I didn't specify. Anyway, I wouldn't take a hard quartering away shot. But a slight quartering away is vey deadly.
11-29-2005 | 10:42 AM
#23
Giant Nontypical
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 7,571
Likes: 0
From:
RE: pls explain - why not this shot
I guess that is exactly what I am trying to say about the shot that is straight down!
I would most definetley take a quartering away shot and hit both lungs. Not a problem. If the angle it too severe though, I wouldn't.
Getting both lungs should be a 100% recovery rate. Getting only one is not. According to John Trout (who is an expert in deer recovery), a single lung hit deer is his least favorite hit to track. Success rate of recovery is low. Now, I'm talking one lung, nothing else.
IMO, aiming at a spine is not ethical. Hey, that's just my opinion. And I would never purposely aim at the spine.
Now if I was confident I could hit a heart on a straight down shot, I'd do it. My problem is having to get through all of that bone that is in my way. To tell the truth, penetration is only part of the reason. The other is arrow deflection. Have you ever seen how an arrow will deflect by just hitting a branch, stick, leaves, etc? Why would I think any other different that bone could not deflect an arrow? Now, if I get that deflection, I'm more then likey to get one lung, which I already stated that I didn't want to do.
TeeJay, what this amounts to is my opinion vs. your on the shot. I have presented my case and you have presented yours. If I absolutely had to put meat on the table, my opinion might be different. But, at this stage of the game I am here to enjoy hunting as part of the archery sport. Possibly wounding an animal is not very much fun. I wish you well, and hope everything works out for you - really.
11-29-2005 | 10:55 AM
#25
Dominant Buck
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,199
Likes: 1
From: Blossvale, New York
RE: pls explain - why not this shot
I'll side with Bobco on this one. Too much junk in the way to pary the arrow. The spine straight on is a tough bugger. With this shot you're hoping to miss all the bad possibilities and have EVERYTHING go your way. That's why we love the broadside shot, What bad possibilities...NOT MANY. When you have to start saying, "If I can do this, and if this doesn't happen........"... well, you're already in a bad situation. You want to take this shot then do it. I suspect that 50 percent of the time you'll beable to give us a first hand story as to "WHY NOT".
