![]() |
huge typical vs huge non-typical
which would you guys rather shoot?? a 200'' typical or a 250'' non-typical with your bow? To me theres nothing more beautiful than a huge clean typical. I would definately choose a huge typical. What about you guys??
|
RE: huge typical vs huge non-typical
perfect symmetrical talltined typical for me.
PT |
RE: huge typical vs huge non-typical
Non-typical because they are much less likely to be around in my area. This one non-typ that I got a pic of this year was the first one in four years of game cam usage.
|
RE: huge typical vs huge non-typical
Probably whichever one walked under my stand first. But if I had a choice, it would a symmetrical non-typical. A monster symmetrical typical frame with double droptines. Ohhhh boy.
|
RE: huge typical vs huge non-typical
ORIGINAL: dwd2001 A monster symmetrical typical frame with double droptines. Ohhhh boy. |
RE: huge typical vs huge non-typical
Typical for me, even if it was asomewhat smaller, relatively, than the non typical. I really don't like non typical racks that much, no matter how big or small.
|
RE: huge typical vs huge non-typical
Double drops for me too, hanging off an otherwise large & typical frame.
|
RE: huge typical vs huge non-typical
Definetly a symetrical typical rack.
Non typical racks can get really ugly IMO. Such as the Beatty buck. It's an enoumous set of bone on that head but man is it ugly. |
RE: huge typical vs huge non-typical
Personally nothing looks better then a huge typical.I think some of these record non typical bucks look lik ecrap.
|
RE: huge typical vs huge non-typical
mass, split brows and double drops. I would die a happy man
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:39 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.