Community
Bowhunting Gear Review Broadheads, arrows, rests, bows, and more... read the latest reviews of hot new gear items related to archery and bowhunting.

hand climber or sit and climb?

Thread Tools
 
Old 08-07-2008 | 07:08 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,469
Likes: 0
From: Isle, MN
Default hand climber or sit and climb?

I'm looking at getting a new climber this year. I have an older api aluminum 'sit and climb' model which works great. what i'm looking at getting is something really light and less bulky. the summit openshot looks good. Is it hard to climb with the 'hand climber' type?

Also, anyone have any recommendations on a light weight climber?
RackLuster is offline  
Reply
Old 08-07-2008 | 07:44 AM
  #2  
Kamil's Avatar
Typical Buck
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 939
Likes: 0
From: New York
Default RE: hand climber or sit and climb?

It's not hard...It just takes more energy and you sweat more. I'm lazy so I prefer a sit and climb.
Kamil is offline  
Reply
Old 08-08-2008 | 11:02 AM
  #3  
midsouth_hunter's Avatar
Fork Horn
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Default RE: hand climber or sit and climb?

I agree with Kamil. Hand climbers is so much extra work and you will sweat more getting up the tree. I would suggest Summit Viper SS.
midsouth_hunter is offline  
Reply
Old 08-08-2008 | 12:17 PM
  #4  
MichaelT.'s Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,174
Likes: 0
From: El Dorado, Arkansas
Default RE: hand climber or sit and climb?

Have had both.... sit and climb is much better....

MET

MichaelT. is offline  
Reply
Old 08-08-2008 | 09:28 PM
  #5  
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Default RE: hand climber or sit and climb?

I' ve used both and I perfer the set and climb type....
Born 2 Bow Hunt is offline  
Reply
Old 08-09-2008 | 01:03 AM
  #6  
sixgunluvr's Avatar
Fork Horn
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 487
Likes: 0
From: WV
Default RE: hand climber or sit and climb?

Hand climbers suck....I mean.. I prefer sit and climb.
sixgunluvr is offline  
Reply
Old 08-09-2008 | 11:10 PM
  #7  
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 866
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: hand climber or sit and climb?

ORIGINAL: sixgunluvr

Hand climbers suck....I mean.. I prefer sit and climb.
LOL
Dozen Arrows is offline  
Reply
Old 08-10-2008 | 08:59 AM
  #8  
MOhunting's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
From: MO
Default RE: hand climber or sit and climb?

Yeah I have both too, and I like the sit and climbA LOT more, but the hand climbers are lighter
MOhunting is offline  
Reply
Old 08-10-2008 | 12:00 PM
  #9  
JeramyK's Avatar
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,784
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Default RE: hand climber or sit and climb?

I have an older API climber as well and it weighs around 33lbs. Many of the newer climbers are much lighter. Generally between 18-22lbs. A lot of guys looking for the lightest weight climber recommend the Lone Wolf sit and climb. But at the price of $350 it's going to be one of the more expensive. Summits sit and climb models are probably the most popular and weigh around 22lbs or so.
JeramyK is offline  
Reply
Old 08-10-2008 | 08:35 PM
  #10  
oldreloader's Avatar
Fork Horn
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
From: Magnolia, AR
Default RE: hand climber or sit and climb?

The older I get the more I like the sit and clmb. The last hand climber I had was with a Baker stand. YEP, it's been a while!
oldreloader is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.