Magnus Stinger Buzzcuts...No Good
#1
http://www.huntingnet.com/forum/tm.aspx?m=1738371
There is the link to a description of a deer I shot today with the Magnus Stinger Buzzcuts...
All in all, they dont leave a very good blood trail at all, be warned!
There have been reports of this on other forums as well.
There is the link to a description of a deer I shot today with the Magnus Stinger Buzzcuts...
All in all, they dont leave a very good blood trail at all, be warned!
There have been reports of this on other forums as well.
#3
I have heard that the Buzzcuts have poor blood trails too. A serrated blade is good for a sawing action but for slicing on a single pass, it's not the best opton.
Campo, try the regular magnus with the bleeder blades, I think you'll have much better success with those.
Campo, try the regular magnus with the bleeder blades, I think you'll have much better success with those.
#4
ORIGINAL: mobowhuntr
I've shot 2 doe this fall with the Magnus Stinger and they left blood trails a blind man could have followed.
I've shot 2 doe this fall with the Magnus Stinger and they left blood trails a blind man could have followed.
#5
Yes, campo, I will heed the warning. Never thought a serrated blade was the ticket anyway. Everyone knows that if you want to bleed to death, cut yourself shaving or use the edge of a piece of paper...LOL Half the time you could almost die from blood loss before you get those two type of cuts to slow down.
#6
Fork Horn
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
From: Panama City Beach FL USA
I would not think the broadhead is to blame for a poor blood trail. I have seen old school two blade heads produce copious amounts of blood while a four blade Muzzy produced very little, both with double lung hits. I have seen a 22 cal. bullet cause more blood then a 7mm mag with a Ballistic tip bullet. I have personnaly seen human trauma with very deep and clean lacerations produce very little blood while large abrasions bleed like hell. So many varriables go into producing a profuse blood trail that to make a staement that the Buzzy Cut was to blame is very unfounded and inaccurate and more based on emotion then fact...
#7
ORIGINAL: Campo
Hmm...seems that there are some conflicting reports here. Either way, I think I am going to switch, I like three blades more that two man and two bleeder blades.
ORIGINAL: mobowhuntr
I've shot 2 doe this fall with the Magnus Stinger and they left blood trails a blind man could have followed.
I've shot 2 doe this fall with the Magnus Stinger and they left blood trails a blind man could have followed.
#8
ORIGINAL: Capt Ray
I would not think the broadhead is to blame for a poor blood trail. I have seen old school two blade heads produce copious amounts of blood while a four blade Muzzy produced very little, both with double lung hits. I have seen a 22 cal. bullet cause more blood then a 7mm mag with a Ballistic tip bullet. I have personnaly seen human trauma with very deep and clean lacerations produce very little blood while large abrasions bleed like hell. So many varriables go into producing a profuse blood trail that to make a staement that the Buzzy Cut was to blame is very unfounded and inaccurate and more based on emotion then fact...
I would not think the broadhead is to blame for a poor blood trail. I have seen old school two blade heads produce copious amounts of blood while a four blade Muzzy produced very little, both with double lung hits. I have seen a 22 cal. bullet cause more blood then a 7mm mag with a Ballistic tip bullet. I have personnaly seen human trauma with very deep and clean lacerations produce very little blood while large abrasions bleed like hell. So many varriables go into producing a profuse blood trail that to make a staement that the Buzzy Cut was to blame is very unfounded and inaccurate and more based on emotion then fact...
The fact is, sir, that you failed to read the other posts that I referred to where people had similar problems.
Still, I stand by my guns, not a fan at all of these broadheads.




