![]() |
Originally Posted by WV Hunter
(Post 4251756)
Absolutely. To me, that is the MOST important thing. For target shooting, sure... about any bullet is fine. The cheaper the better if you shoot a ton. But for hunting, I want the best money can buy. I know for me personally, if I have a great year I might be shooting 3-4 bullets during hunting season with a ML... typically more like 1 or 2. Certainly not cost prohibitive.
Great shooting Ron! Sub MOA grouping is impressive for sure... not only the rifle/load but the shooter as well :cool2: So I thought I would check... even a box of Hornady .458x300 gr. is now $30! I remember when???? |
Nice shooting Ron. My target stand is an old real estate sign. I can step on the lower bar and it drives the legs into even slightly frozen ground or snow. I replace the cardboard for a paper target base every year or as needed if I shoot it out.
|
Originally Posted by sabotloader
(Post 4251736)
I would hope that you are not just judging the value of a bullet by it accuracy. Terminal Performance carries a bigger value for me than just accuracy.
Originally Posted by WV Hunter
(Post 4251756)
Absolutely. To me, that is the MOST important thing. For target shooting, sure... about any bullet is fine. The cheaper the better if you shoot a ton. But for hunting, I want the best money can buy.
I shoot those 300 gr XTPs in .451" and .429" out of my 50s and also the 200 gr 10mm from my .45. I've shot 10-12 deer with them and the farthest any one went was about 50 yard or so. So I have no complaints. As for performance, I've never found a bullet as they were all pass throughs but the internal damage was severe. One buck I shot with a 200 gr 10mm bullet was a legitimate 200+ lb 10 point that only ran 35 yards before piling up. Both lugs destroyed and top of heart busted up. For some reason, again my opinion, people think they need a premium bullet for deer size game. I don't believe they have evolved into some kind of armored super deer. Now if you get significantly better accuracy from a bullet like the Lehigh or if your state does not allow lead projectiles then by all means I'm all for using them. |
Originally Posted by bronko22000
(Post 4251680)
......200 yards is a long way to throw a ML bullet.
The Lehighs are nice but......at just 5/8" difference in group size at 200 yards that ain't enough to justify buying them......... Actually the XTP was more accurate than the Lehigh if one tosses out the first shot from a cold, squeaky clean barrel. See the photo with the shots numbered in order. The Lehigh should be devastating on a deer, but then again the XTP does horrible things to deers too. Just last week 10 boxes of them XTP were placed on our door step for just $188, which is about what they cost 5 years ago. This is a good thing, because the cardboard in the target stand gets replaced about twice a month, except during hunting season. |
Originally Posted by bronko22000
(Post 4251801)
I don't want to get into a war on words with bullets because we all have our own opinions.
I shoot those 300 gr XTPs in .451" and .429" out of my 50s and also the 200 gr 10mm from my .45. I've shot 10-12 deer with them and the farthest any one went was about 50 yard or so. So I have no complaints. As for performance, I've never found a bullet as they were all pass throughs but the internal damage was severe. One buck I shot with a 200 gr 10mm bullet was a legitimate 200+ lb 10 point that only ran 35 yards before piling up. Both lugs destroyed and top of heart busted up. For some reason, again my opinion, people think they need a premium bullet for deer size game. I don't believe they have evolved into some kind of armored super deer. Now if you get significantly better accuracy from a bullet like the Lehigh or if your state does not allow lead projectiles then by all means I'm all for using them. Not everybody is talking about deer when they mention terminal performance. I know in the case of me, grouse, or Mike we're probably thinking about elk. What works on deer may not be good for elk. |
Originally Posted by Muley Hunter
(Post 4251815)
Not everybody is talking about deer when they mention terminal performance. I know in the case of me, grouse, or Mike we're probably thinking about elk. What works on deer may not be good for elk.
|
I've never run into that, but if someone needs an animal bad enough to steal it. They can have it and i'll just keep hunting for another one.
|
I wouldn't hesitate to use a 300 gr XTP on a 300+ lb deer or even an elk for that matter.
Muley I believe that most in here are deer oriented. You and a few others I can understand your reasoning for a bullet that will perform well on elk. And IMO the XTP would stand up to the task. And as I recall you like to get close like me and prefer the .54 PRB and traditional gear. |
Me thinks a better option for elk would be the 300g XTP magnum, but i sure wouldn't use it on deer.
|
Originally Posted by ronlaughlin
(Post 4251910)
Me thinks a better option for elk would be the 300g XTP magnum, but i sure wouldn't use it on deer.
for .45-70 |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:55 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.