![]() |
Originally Posted by MountainDevil54
(Post 4240570)
the optima is more sleek and low profile while the accura has a bigger/fatter looking stock. The Optima thumbhole however is only good for a scope while the v2 accura stock works both ways, one reason its larger.
For scoped muzzy, I much prefer the optima v2 because the stock fits me so well. |
I havent messed with the LR yet. I figured the 27" barrel was more than enough LOL. Either will do the job perfectly in the right hands.
|
Originally Posted by MountainDevil54
(Post 4240577)
I havent messed with the LR yet. I figured the 27" barrel was more than enough LOL. Either will do the job perfectly in the right hands.
|
Only when you're leading a running deer, and smack the barrel on a tree.
|
Originally Posted by Muley Hunter
(Post 4240585)
Only when you're leading a running deer, and smack the barrel on a tree.
|
Originally Posted by muzzlestuffer
(Post 4240589)
there are not many trees in arizona just bushes ! lol
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
That Optima is one ugly look'n rifle. That Traditions looks more like a real muzzleloader.
|
Originally Posted by Berettaman
(Post 4240020)
Hi all,
I'm considering using a Muzzleloader next year during our state's shotgun deer season. We have a couple new blinds that could possibly require shots out to 150 - 175 Yds and i don't think my shotgun is up to it. I would also like to use the ML for a mule deer hunt out west. And it's time for a new toy. :) interested in what people have to say about the new crop of ML's out there now. I had a Traditions inline years ago, but it looks like things have changed quite a but since then. Interested in your feedback. Thanks |
All inlines are ugly. :p
|
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:37 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.