Go Back  HuntingNet.com Forums > Firearms Forum > Black Powder
Off Topic but well written >

Off Topic but well written

Black Powder Ask opinions of other hunters on new technology, gear, and the methods of blackpowder hunting.

Off Topic but well written

Old 02-18-2014, 12:58 PM
  #1  
Typical Buck
Thread Starter
 
jaybez101099's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Maryland
Posts: 601
Default Off Topic but well written

When Hunting Became Shooting



By Gene Wensel

 

Since I became an official senior citizen, Iíve been accused several times of teetering somewhere between senility and wisdom. Someone now has to push almost seventy candles into my annual cake.

I remember when camo was only available in military issue or red and black checkered shirts; when deer camps all smelled like Hoppeís #9; when four wheel drive vehicles were all Jeeps; when the color blaze orange had not yet been invented. There were no ATVsÖ..no snowmobiles. Snowshoes and treestands were all made out of wood. Luggage and bows did not have wheels. Boys built slingshots. Kids caught night crawlers and sold them with the help of a sign in the front yard. We played "Cowboys and Injuns," constructed "forts," both underground and up in trees. We had BB guns, shot tweety birds stone dead without eating them, did daily chores unpaid and rode bikes without helmets. We carried "milk money" to school every day. Boys fought without knives, and in our hearts we knew that all girls had "cooties."

When I was still a teenager, I visited the Orvis rod plant in Manchester, Vermont. From a rack in the front of their factory store, I lovingly fondled a featherweight split bamboo cane fly rod. It was only 5 feet long (much shorter than most fly rods) and was made for a 5 weight lineÖ. perfect for many of Vermontís small trout streams. It wore an all cork handle and a reel seat of simple split rings. If I remember right, it weighed a mere 1 7/8 oz. It was a supreme example of artistic elegance and pure class. I wanted it very much, but the price tag on it said exactly $100, way more than I had to my name. Today that same rod sells for well over $2000.

Prices have changed. Times have changed. People have changed. Society has changed. We are now several generations removed from the farm but still need to grow things. Half a century ago, the term "politically correctí was nonexistent. "Boy scout" has taken on a whole new meaning, if you get my drift. Todayís youngsters spend all their free time in front of television sets, computers or at malls instead of out in the woods. Kids feel naked without their very own cell phone within reach. People previously known as "whippersnappers" now play violent video games or watch television when not texting or talking on their phones. Teens quit doing chores for under $50 an hour. They also carry charge cards. They donít walk anywhere they can ride. No more roving lawn mower or snow shoveling jobs are solicited. Boys wear earrings and necklaces. Girls get boyísnames tattooed onto various body parts. Our "Commander in Chief" thinks heís an emperor but looks and acts more like Steven Urkel than John Wayne or General George Patton. You get the pictureÖ..

Our wind figuratively changed when hunting became an industry. In my opinion, it all started when television stole much of our free time. Interest in the "Big Three" hunting magazines soon waned. Television was King! So was Elvis. We had to endure live action bowling. Ed Sullivan offered us not only Elvis and the Beatles, but special talent acts like a guy spinning dinner plates on under-spined arrow shafts. We had Howdy Doody and a talking horse named Mr. Ed. I even watched Lassie right up until the episode where the kid got his foot caught in a huge bear trap, then sent his loyal dog rushing back to the barn with instructions to bring back a C-clamp. A dog smart enough to fetch a C-clamp? Gimme a break.

Television went through understandable growing pains. Then about twenty years ago, actual hunting shows were born, finding an uncomfortable niche right alongside Star Wars, horror films, I Love Lucy re-runs, fifty new sit-coms and soft porn. Never again did we have to watch Ozzie Nelson walk around his own home wearing a suit and tie when he had no apparent job. Mr. Ed went to the glue factory. Howdy Doody came down with mildew or dry rot, Iím not sure which, but the painted freckles eventually fell off his face.

Today weíre offered full season, weekly TV episodes about people who catch turtles for a living, "exterminators" who donít kill much except insects, gator hunters who seemingly talk with marbles in their mouths to the point TV producers have to subtitle whatever they say as if theyíre speaking in a foreign language. "I seen three bucks" makes hunters sound uneducated. The hunt for Bigfoot continues. One of these days sasquatch hunters might consider leaving a bunch of trail cameras out for more than a few days at a time. On the TV menu are weekly shows about driving trucks on icy roads, logging, towing vehicles, raising little girls with double chins, the trials and tribulations of "Little People," the fine art of junk picking and hoarding at itís worst. Five year old girls are painted up for beauty contests. Weíre even treated to one about the perils of being a meter maid. Drama choices are endless! Had enough? Apparently not yet.

With hunting shows, celebrities seemingly came out of nowhere, all jockeying not for entertainment or educational value, but for pole positions of name recognition among their peers, potential sponsors and new followers. Our attention and interest were tested with lots of whispering, poorly hidden commercials, catch phrases, bad acting by people trying to be funny, and shameless, even embarrassing, high five whooping and hollering rants. It didnít take long for me to realize far too many celebrity hosts and guest hunters have a very hard time differentiating love from lust.

Television hunting shows made hunting look easy, programming youngsters to expect success without ever really earning it and getting quickly frustrated when "it" didnít happen soon enough. Commercialized gadgets were invented and promoted to eliminate much of the process. Hunters became "athletes." Hunting became a "team sport." People right out of puberty decided to go "Pro," with deadly intentions but foggy direction, skipping any degree of apprenticeship or woodsmanship skills along the way. I continue to see six year old kids posing their best "bad ass" faces for hero photos. Kids young enough to wear pajamas with the feet attached are regularly seen posing behind trophy bucks. Youngsters who still get a lollipop whenever they sleep dry are shooting big game. Deer are now "whacked," "popped," or "smoked" from long ranges. Arrows became "meat missiles," while bullets became "pills." Just this morning I saw a photo of a bowhunter posing with his dead critter. On the horizontal rib cage of his prize sat an open can of beer. The words "awesome" and "Thatís what Iím talkiní about!" have risen to far more than standard verbiage.

With the "help" of television celebrities, who often seem to think of themselves as somehow very special, hunting slowly but surely lost itís romance. Our "music" increased in tempo but lost itís rhythm. Many hunters donít even get into the woods anymore. There is no story attached to 90% of the deer killed on television these days. "Just put me in a good spot" is all they expect. Traditional deer camps were soldÖ. or only used for poker, booze, smoking, or to test drive new girlfriends.

Hunting became shooting. "Bows" that look more like James Bond tools came to be known as "weapons." Instead of trying to get as close as possible to big game, the challenge evolved to how far away one could "whack" a deer with either bows or gunsÖ.it didnít really matter. Just last night I watched a celebrity bowhunter "whack" his "biggest buck ever" (home grown to boot) from 56 yards. I think that buck deserved betterÖ.at least the decency of a closer encounter with his predator.

Primitive black powder firearms grew into nothing more than single shot rifles without the brass, using pellets rather than powder, big scopes, thumbhole stocks, bipods, etc. I even saw a muzzleloader dude carrying two of them in case he needed a second shot! I made a mental note to myself: "There could be a market out there for double barreled muzzleloaders....maybe even repeaters."

Pre and extended primitive "weapons" big game seasons, those fought hard for and established by none other than our bowhunting pioneers, were quickly infiltrated by hundreds of thousands of opportunists simply looking for an easier way to fill their entitled "extra" tags.

"Hunting" shows often display sniper talent. Now, before someone takes a bead on me, I want to admit Iíve always admired and respected long range shooting skills of snipers. Iíve bought and read stuff by and about guys like Carlos Hathcock, Chris Kyle, Simo Hayha, etc. But, when hunting is confused with long range shooting, one canít help but realize sniper talent often emerges as little more than superb target shooting at live targets. Again, no disrespect to long range sniper skills, but in my opinion, anything over 400 yards is a whole lot more about shooting than hunting. The only real hunting part is spotting the animal from afar and stalking or crawling into position to set up for the shot. I might also mention here that I am an NRA "Lifer," and by no means an anti-gun person whatsoever.

Back in the "Golden Age" of deer hunting, many if not most deer were killed with open sighted .30-30s. I once commented to my dad that a seemingly higher percentage of big bucks were taken in "the good old days," even though total deer numbers were not nearly as high in that era. Dad pointed out the biggest reason was possibly because most hunters used open sights. Few carried, nor could afford, binoculars or scopes. Since shooting doe deer was not cool in those days, spikes and forkhorns with small antlers were not easily identified as bucks from long range, and so were not shot at. HuhÖ.

In long range shooting, with either gun or bow, the absolutely necessary and noble relationship between predator and prey is remarkably reduced or even eliminated. From greater distances, a game animalís ability to even be aware of a hunter by way of their normal senses is reduced to all but worthless levels. Because of that fact, there is no longer any real connection with the animal, and therefore not much of a hunt. Elevated "shooting houses" set up on the edges of food plots are correctly named.

Many, if not most, modern hunters are opportunists. Fred Bear himself put that philosophy into motion with his "two season hunter" concept, which in truth was little more than a shrewd marketing plan, at least at the time. Most opportunists are essentially the definition of the word. They choose expediency over basic principles. A big problem surfaces when opportunists sacrifice principles. Opportunists not only despise failure, but most cannot handle it. They dislike eating tag soup, preferring to kill their game "the easiest legal way." Going home with no blood on their hands apparently leaves a bad taste in their mouths.

Most opportunists donít belong to much of anything, because many are simply users who donít really care. There is a big difference in having an interest in something and being passionate enough about anything to really care.

Hunters need to encourage and embrace the challenge instead of the "kill at all costs" attitude. Risking an unfilled tag will require re-education of the general public to the sweetness of maybe accomplishing things a harder way, which is often also a simpler way. It becomes a values thing.

Slipping the crossbow mentality and justification into archery seasons under the disguise of it being a "more efficient weapon" (thereís that weapon word again) is little more than an opportunistís excuse and a money driven marketing ploy. I had a hard time not laughing when an able-bodied neighbor of my brother lobbed off two of his fingers the very first time he took a shot at a nice buck with his brand new crossbow.

True disabilities aside, there is simply no reason to allow crossbows outside of gun seasons. When states dump the truly physically impaired requisite, we end up with 90% being mere opportunists. Once again, our biggest problem comes along when these opportunists sacrifice principles. Our deep outdoor passion should never be thought of as any sort of "entitlement," which unfortunately is the way the majority of users interpret things today. In reality, opportunists might have efficiency, but they display very little class.

Using bows and arrows at ultra close range puts the hunt in hunting. Was a big buck shot from a vehicle hunted or simply shot? Was he an accomplishment to be proud of or closer to nothing but a victim? In truth, many "sport hunters" have little or no desire (or time) to honestly engage an animal up close and personal, instead following the simplistic philosophy that getting a job done the quickest, easiest way is the best way. This last sentence in itself is a sad reminder that the hunting process has been watered down to pathetic levels. We need to get back into the woods! Shortening the learning curve that comes as a part of any apprenticeship is not the answer. Hunting needs to once again become a "values" issue, accepting challenges but not pushing past them. Extending oneís personal range limits quickly takes our passion from the level of a challenge to that of a stunt, often justified solely by the fact they saw someone on TV pull it off once.

Respect for wildlife continues to diminish. Deer are not targets. We are not at war with wildlife. Product names need not imply death, destruction, fury, evil, or hatred.

Who could have predicted egotistical hunting celebrities would someday show up in tour buses and pickup trucks that look more like they belong in a parade? Who would have guessed that hunting celebrities would make statements like, "I wouldnít think of going hunting without wearing Brand X camo." Who "woulda thunk" broadheads would sell for $40 each and the hunting industry might get to where breast implants would become a deductible business expense?

Hunting, our beloved passion, needs to be redefined and fixed...reborn if you will.

Self imposed rules of conduct can and should be shared, shown, and encouraged by wise, strong-willed people with good values. As things play out now, right or wrong is too often cast aside during the process of interpretation.

It has always fascinated me how flyfishermen can smoothly pull off crusading their passion and beliefs with mass acceptance. They have their very own organizations, seasons, stretches of water, their own magazines, TV shows, mail order catalogs, outfitters, etc. without seemingly offending other fishermen using bait, spinning rods or high tech gear. They express and even flaunt class right before the eyes of "gill crushers" with minimal opposition. How can they do that? One of the reasons is that fishing can be a non-consumptive catch and release pastime, while death is a part of hunting that cannot be avoided nor denied quite as easily.

I canít help but ask myself why high-tech hunters, once they "master" their hunting tools, donít naturally and instinctively realize such and revert to increasing personal challenge levels one way or another rather than pushing onward.

Hunting will regain its identity only by embracing the journeyÖ. selling the process rather than the product. There is nothing wrong with intensity, but we must express love of the hunt rather than lust for the hunt! Admitting and agreeing that there is in fact a problem that clear thinking could help is a step in the right direction, even if addressed one hunter at a time.

Those in my circles have been talking about the dilemmas within modern hunting practices and the truth that there is a need to do something about them, but the answers have been unclear. Translating these tasks to actions will be our biggest new challenge. We need to educate the masses to realize that at least right now, more of them are guilty than innocent.

In truth, what you are reading here would never be seen published in any mainstream outdoor media because it would piss off multiple advertisers enough for them to jump ship. When principles face profits, the outcome is seldom positive. Most outdoor media needs to first recognize the fact that currently they are part of the problem more than the solution.

True love of the outdoors and passion for the chase is not for everyone, but in my opinion, itís time to put the hunt back in hunting.
jaybez101099 is offline  
Old 02-18-2014, 02:25 PM
  #2  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Saxonburg Pa
Posts: 3,925
Default

That's why I like the USA, freedom of choice. We need to keep it that way.
Grouse45 is offline  
Old 02-18-2014, 04:36 PM
  #3  
Boone & Crockett
 
Semisane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: River Ridge, LA (Suburb of New Orleans)
Posts: 10,917
Default

While I agree with much of the general sentiment professed, I also smell the odor of elitism. Ironically, this is from a guy who sells his own brand of broadheads and markets DVD's of his hunts. I haven't seen his DVD's, but wonder if any of them feature a doe kill? All the pictures on his web site are monster bucks.

As for the general sentiment, I too hate to see those pictures of first deer/big buck kills by six year olds. (I've alway though a kid's first deer should be a doe. Don't ask me why - it's just the way I feel.)

I suspect most of us on this site started our hunting career on squirrels and rabbits (and if you're like me - robins). I think that's a good thing. But it seems these days a youngster's first hunt is almost always whitetails. That's probably a natural result of urbanization, but it's a shame.

Last edited by Semisane; 02-18-2014 at 09:07 PM.
Semisane is offline  
Old 02-18-2014, 07:38 PM
  #4  
Nontypical Buck
 
Blackpowdersmoke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Penns Woods
Posts: 1,628
Default

Originally Posted by Semisane
While I agree with much of the general sentiment professed, I also smell the odor of elitism. Ironically, this is from a guy who sells his own brand of broadheads and markets DVD's of his hunts. I haven't seen his DVD's, but wonder if any of them feature a doe kill? All the pictures on his web site are monster bucks.

As for the general sentiment, I too hate to see those pictures of first deer/big buck kills by six year olds. (I've alway though a kid's first deer should be a doe. Don't ask be why - it's just the way I feel.)

I suspect most of us on this site started our hunting career on squirrels and rabbits (and if you're like me - robins). I thing that's a good thing. But it seems these days a youngster's first hunt is almost whitetails. That's probably a natural result of urbanization, but it's a shame.
Semi,

I don't see it that way as far as elitism. I can remember watching VHS tapes of the Wensel brothers (they're twins..Gene and Barry) years ago and was very impressed with how they hunted. They shot instinctively with recurve bows and consistently killed running deer (both bucks and does) on drives with shots at relatively close distances of 30 yds. or less because they practiced extensively with their equipment. They would roll a car tire with a balloon taped in the center down a bumpy slope and shoot at it for practice. The Wensel brothers grew up here in PA and honed their hunting skills here in our Eastern hardwoods and mountainous terrain before moving west to Montana (I believe it was Montana). As far as what they do now with regard to what they use/promote/sell/endorse, I don't know, but everyone has to make a living.

I think what he had to say about the way hunting is being "dramatized" as far as our kids are concerned is correct as well. I think many times it's more about "Daddy's bragging rights" than it is Juniors. I took my son hunting with me many times before he was able to have a license and legally hunt (at that time, 12 yrs. old in PA) because it wasn't about him shooting anything, he wasn't allowed to. It was more about acclimating him into a hunting environment and teaching him what he needed to know about the sport of hunting.

I can pretty much agree with everything the man had to say, hunting has become a "glamour sport" as far as the media is concerned... (do Lee and Tiffany come to mind?). I also feel he is "spot on" with his sentiment toward black powder firearms and crossbows. Yes, I use a crossbow to hunt the archery season now due to physical limitations, but what the man had to say about both was a total reflection of how I feel.

I also totally agree with what he had to say about "entitlement". When hunting became a money sport, it became an entitlement sport. If I pay you this much... How big of a buck can I shoot on your lease or ranch, etc.? Or... I'm going to buy a non-res Illinois tag but if I can't kill a trophy class buck with this or that outfitter, I'll go elsewhere because if I pay the money, I'M ENTITLED!

Long range shooting??? Where I grew up in PA, it was nothing to be able to shoot long distances across cut corn or hayfields at a standing deer 300-400 yards away (or more if you thought you could make the shot). It's still that way here where I live for the most part, but I never subscribed to that mentality and still don't. I never really saw the sport in it. It's always meant more to me to hunt in the woods, be patient, and wait for the optimum shot to take a deer up close and personal.

Gene's final statement couldn't be further from the truth...

"it's time to put the hunt back in hunting"

Oh...as you stated Semi, you grew up shooting Robins...if my Dad ever caught me shooting a Robin with my BB gun he would have whooped my @$$!!! But I could shoot all the Starlings I wanted!

BPS

Last edited by Blackpowdersmoke; 02-18-2014 at 07:54 PM.
Blackpowdersmoke is offline  
Old 02-19-2014, 05:01 AM
  #5  
Nontypical Buck
 
alleyyooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: MICHIGAN
Posts: 2,568
Talking

I remember the days many years ago when school let out on fall days. My brother and I would run the 1/4 mile home from that little one room school house with 18 students from Kindergarteners to 8th grade. We would grab the shot guns and head for the woods that was all thick brush and berry brambles to get a shot at partridges.
Some I knew who live in Sothern Michigan did about the same thing except they rode a school bus home and then went after pheasants in the corn and bean fields.

I used to turn the circuit breaker off to get my son off his butt and go out side. Once out side he would keep going bad in to see if the TV would work.

Our deer camp cabin still smells of Hopps #9 and drying wool outer clothing, coffee, bacon and fresh baked bread.

Al

Last edited by alleyyooper; 02-19-2014 at 05:05 AM.
alleyyooper is offline  
Old 02-20-2014, 05:20 PM
  #6  
Spike
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Virginia, near the Rappahannock where fresh water turns salty
Posts: 61
Default

Know lots about the OP ways and thoughts. He's a "sportsman". In it only for the sport. My family has a very long history of hunting being a way to feed people and earn a living, put $ in your pocket and clothes on the familys back and a roof over your head. My family was trappers, watermen and shooters from way back. I still know where there are 2 battery guns and a home made punter as killin waterfowl was employment back in the day. Grandmaw even sent us out to get "some birds" for pie and soup many times, and she warnt talkin bout quail or ducks. She liked what she called "berry birds" and that was waxwings, bobolinks and robins. Blackbirds would do in a pinch. Shooting them now will get you thrown under the jail.

Even now I am a trapper and have a "nuisance wildlife" control permit from G&F. I've participated in deer "herd reduction" and other wildlife control activities. Hunting, I still enjoy, but to me shooting a deer isn't really any more thrilling or demanding than shooting squirrels or groundhogs. What I really like is getting that egg eating coon or dam digging muskrat in my traps.

However I have to agree with the OP that todays "sportsmen" have bout ruined a lot of hunting, but the process started long ago. Even now just look at how "self important" some people are about "their" sport. Besides the anti hunters and vegans look at the anti crossbow sentiment, anti compound bow, anti smokeless muzzleloaders, anti hunting deer-bear-cougar-whatever with dogs, anti baiting, anti electronic calls of various sorts, anti electronic decoys, anti turkey decoy, anti shotgun for this and anti rifle for that, anti drive hunt, anti anti anti...

I certainly understand the OP and what he is saying, I agree about much of what he says, I have my own way of doin things and so long as it's legal it's MY CHOICE. If you don't agree with how I'm doin it you couldn't measure how little I care about what you think.

Hope all warm and toasty and had a good season. Fish are next, gillnets, pots, trap nets, trotlines, juggin and set poles.
10
10 ga is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information -

Copyright © 2023 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.