Experimenting @ the Farm
#11
Typical Buck
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 818
Likes: 0
From:
All those petals flying around.............Sounds like a good way to turn a lung shot into a gut shot. Fine on critters you don't want to eat I guess. Maybe I'm simple, but it seems unneccesary to me. A 45 cal hole through north american game will "devastate" them just fine without ancillary wound channels. Good luck with it.
#12
#13
All those petals flying around.............Sounds like a good way to turn a lung shot into a gut shot. Fine on critters you don't want to eat I guess. Maybe I'm simple, but it seems unneccesary to me. A 45 cal hole through north american game will "devastate" them just fine without ancillary wound channels. Good luck with it.
It really took me awhile to buy into the bullet also but after using it now for several years - all I can tell you is it works for me.
#14
NULA is a 1-32 twist and a 300gr is a bit rough over 2000fps. It might work but i use the faster powders in the NULA with lighter bullets. The Savage is a cream puff by comparison with starting loads of N120 or Reloder7 and a 325gr FTX.
Im only guessing but i would bet its possible to get the Lehigh 305gr in the 2200fps range without too much effort.
Im only guessing but i would bet its possible to get the Lehigh 305gr in the 2200fps range without too much effort.
Last edited by Gm54-120; 10-04-2012 at 06:39 AM.
#15
NULA is a 1-32 twist and a 300gr is a bit rough over 2000fps. It might work but i use the faster powders in the NULA with lighter bullets. The Savage is a cream puff by comparison with starting loads of N120 or Reloder7 and a 325gr FTX.
Im only guessing but i would bet its possible to get the Lehigh 305gr in the 2200fps range without too much effort.
Im only guessing but i would bet its possible to get the Lehigh 305gr in the 2200fps range without too much effort.
2200 - should not be a reall problem - I am shooting them at 1950 with 120 T7.
Also remember I am loading them in a sabot and they are an extremly smooth loading. I really am impressed with the bullet.
One of the big differences between it and the normal 300 grain Bloodline is the nose of the bullet. It is stronger and thicker. It will operate as designed down to around 1100 fps - which easily gets me to 200 yards...
#16
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,445
Likes: 0
I know the operation of this type of bullet is hard to visualize and maybe understand but one thing you should know it is not new. Europeans have been using these type bullets long before and using much smaller rifles to get the job done.
It really took me awhile to buy into the bullet also but after using it now for several years - all I can tell you is it works for me.
It really took me awhile to buy into the bullet also but after using it now for several years - all I can tell you is it works for me.
However, assuming you put your shot forward of the diaphram, ask yourself what animal will these bullets kill that non-fragmenting bullets would not.
I've see a few deer shot with Remington Copper Solid slugs. They have petals as well. They work too. But do they kill game any "deader" than a 50 cal solid slug? I don't think so.
I will concede that this kind of bullet may perform better on game if a marginal hit is made. There's always a chance for some petals to hit the vitals, even if the shank does not.
#17
I have posted this before and it is probably getting old but this is my definition of a near perfect bullet. I was originally developed around a Nosler Partition and now has been altered to relfect some of the characteristics of the Lehigh/Bloodline.
The Hunting bullet should be the most lethal big game hunting bullet available. The bullet design should allow the bullet to penetrate 2” to 3”, through bone or tissue, before it starts to expand the petals. After the bullet starts to expand or shed it petals it should adversely affect all the surrounding internal organs. The combination between the expansion of the bullet and/or release of the petals and the creation of hydrostatic shock produces a massive wound cavity within the vital area (internal organs) that can be 13” to 15” long. I believe that in most case the bullet should pass through the body providing a secondary exit hole for blood and debris. This massive wound cavity results in the animal dropping fast since most go into shock after such a tremendous blow. Those animals that don’t go down immediately will soon succumb to blood pressure loss and/or organ failure producing a quick ethical kill. Using a bullet matching this description will normally result in an animal that goes down fast so you can enjoy the results of your hunt without having to track the wounded animal after the shot.
I've see a few deer shot with Remington Copper Solid slugs. They have petals as well. They work too. But do they kill game any "deader" than a 50 cal solid slug? I don't think so.
I will concede that this kind of bullet may perform better on game if a marginal hit is made. There's always a chance for some petals to hit the vitals, even if the shank does not.
Last edited by sabotloader; 10-04-2012 at 08:13 AM.
#18
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,445
Likes: 0
I see what you're saying.
I've always been in the camp that believes that if velocity is equal, a bullet that holds together while expanding at least somewhat, is better than a bullet that fragments.
With a substantial shank left to penetrate and hopefully exit the animal, the shedding of petals probably does no harm and may help in certain circumstances.
I'll continue to shoot good old Maxiballs in my Renegades and FPBs in my inline. These bullets are pricey enough for me and have never given me a reason to look for more knockdown power.
I've always been in the camp that believes that if velocity is equal, a bullet that holds together while expanding at least somewhat, is better than a bullet that fragments.
With a substantial shank left to penetrate and hopefully exit the animal, the shedding of petals probably does no harm and may help in certain circumstances.
I'll continue to shoot good old Maxiballs in my Renegades and FPBs in my inline. These bullets are pricey enough for me and have never given me a reason to look for more knockdown power.
#19
I see what you're saying.
I've always been in the camp that believes that if velocity is equal, a bullet that holds together while expanding at least somewhat, is better than a bullet that fragments.
With a substantial shank left to penetrate and hopefully exit the animal, the shedding of petals probably does no harm and may help in certain circumstances.
I'll continue to shoot good old Maxiballs in my Renegades and FPBs in my inline. These bullets are pricey enough for me and have never given me a reason to look for more knockdown power.
I've always been in the camp that believes that if velocity is equal, a bullet that holds together while expanding at least somewhat, is better than a bullet that fragments.
With a substantial shank left to penetrate and hopefully exit the animal, the shedding of petals probably does no harm and may help in certain circumstances.
I'll continue to shoot good old Maxiballs in my Renegades and FPBs in my inline. These bullets are pricey enough for me and have never given me a reason to look for more knockdown power.
We do what works for us...



