HuntingNet.com Forums

HuntingNet.com Forums (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/)
-   Black Powder (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/black-powder-23/)
-   -   Underhammer Build - Status Report #3 (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/black-powder/366130-underhammer-build-status-report-3-a.html)

Semisane 06-12-2012 07:32 PM

Underhammer Build - Status Report #3
 
Finished the final "to scale" plan today and double checked trigger, sear, and striker function. Everything will fit OK and looks like it will work.

First real fabrication begins tomorrow. I'll be cutting the breech block out of that 3/4" x 6" x 16" chunk of steel.

Here's the final drawing and parts list.




wildeboer 06-12-2012 09:20 PM

Looks quite interesting though, cant wait to see the finished product and results. Holding thumbs that it's accurate.

Underclocked 06-12-2012 10:25 PM

Don't know about that trigger. ;) Maybe you should put a notch at the rearward end of the cocking lever slot to act as a safety. A shroud that is only open at the bottom might be a good idea to cover that nipple area.

Semisane 06-13-2012 05:17 AM


Don't know about that trigger.
I don't know about it either UC. It functions perfectly as a cardboard cutout model. But of course, the model is not under spring pressure. Sear pin engagement and shape will be critical and something I will need to play with after it's built.


Maybe you should put a notch at the rearward end of the cocking lever slot to act as a safety.
Yeah, I'm considering that and two other possible set-ups for a safety. Those adjustments will be easy to make after the build. The problem with a notch is the striker would have to rotate for the cocking rod to drop into the slot. That would require the sear pin engage a differently shaped cavity in the striker rather than a simple round hole. But it's probably doable.


A shroud that is only open at the bottom might be a good idea to cover that nipple area.
Actually, I plan to have the rear of the forend extend all the way to the breech face with a hole in the bottom to install the cap. I'm hoping I will be able to put a cap on the nipple with my fingers, but may need to use a capper. I dislike cappers for some reason. Maybe I've never had a good one.

lemoyne 06-13-2012 06:15 AM

Looks like a modified inline,all the underhammers I ever seen or owned had the hammer underneath striking upward. Also it looks like the leverage on the trigger is wrong making for a very difficult trigger.

Semisane 06-13-2012 06:55 AM


Looks like a modified inline
True, except the barrel is interchangable.


All the underhammers I ever seen or owned had the hammer underneath striking upward.
Yep. And until Knight marketed in-lines all of the muzzleloaders we saw had hammers. Playing with something different is fun.


Also it looks like the leverage on the trigger is wrong making for a very difficult trigger.
We shall see. The trigger has a mechanical advantage as it's rear rises against the far end of the sear bar. I hope it's enough.

sabotloader 06-13-2012 07:16 AM

Semi

Because of the size of #11 caps and how easily they can be contaminated... I think the capper (good well built brass capper) ideal is the best most positive to handle them.

They make a very small brass capper, that holds 5-7 caps. That is what i use for hunting.

I think you have started yourself an awesome project. Hope it all comes together for you.

bronko22000 06-13-2012 08:00 AM

Semi I understand this is your design but maybe the trigger design can be altered a bit to give you some advantage. How about making the end of the sear bar a hook with a mating notch on the hammer/striker? Then, instead of the sear pin you have, you can drill and tap a hole just behind the trigger that would run up to against the rear of the sear bar. Turning this set screw in or out would enable you to adjust the sear engagement. Pressure from the trigger return spring would provide the necessary upward resistance on the sear.

Semisane 06-13-2012 10:06 AM

DANG Bronko! You may be old, but you're not entirely useless.

That looks like the way to go. Thanks buddy.


Underclocked 06-13-2012 10:45 AM

Instead of just a simple hammer notch, make it follow the circumference of the hammer by a bit more than the amount of travel needed for a notched safety to operate. If that were cut true, it would work nicely.

I would also be sure the only place the trigger bar contacts the sear bar is near the aft end. I'm thinking too much contact along those parallel surfaces would make for somewhat erratic function, especially if any debris gets in there. The contact between those two parts could be limited to the facing of the adjustment screw if the screw was mounted inside the trigger bar itself. Access might be a bit of a problem but that could also be a blessing. You could do just a simple hole upward through the guard area to get to the screw.

A small set screw in from the side of the trigger bar to keep the adjustment screw from moving might be a good add. You will probably only adjust that trigger once but it could still be altered later if need be.

Thinking outloud. ;)


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:24 AM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.