That is the very thing i was dealing with in my mind... the existing image. After shooting that image is completly reversed.

And that is the biggest problem facing a business today - the image - or really what will the public buy into.

Unless we (the shooters with a 1-20 twist gun) can show the image to be incorrect - it might be risky. Even if on a forum like this a few of us can show the it was a bad rap what reall good will that do for the majority of the ML shooters that have a bad image. We are so few and so many never even come here to see what might be happening.

From a business standpoint you might be right - but at this moment from a shooters perspective - i would say bring on the 1-20.

I do not know how Doc White developed his twist rates that were not following the norm - but if his 45 were 1-20 and his 50's are 1-24 - they certainly work. But as Cayugad has said there is more to it than just twist rate. Depth of the lands and grooves fall in there also.

Right now after my limited experiance - I would vote for a 1-20, not for what it will do inside a 100 yards but for what it can do outside of the 100 yard make in maintaining bullet stability.

useful.....

Some things as much as you don't like is better left unsaid......and with that let's stay on the topic please.......

thanks

Dave......JW