HuntingNet.com Forums

HuntingNet.com Forums (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/)
-   Black Powder (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/black-powder-23/)
-   -   drop at 200yds (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/black-powder/351024-drop-200yds.html)

Muley Hunter 10-06-2011 06:44 PM

Ron..........That looks better than a 100yd hold. What do you think?

ronlaughlin 10-07-2011 03:45 AM


Originally Posted by Muley Hunter (Post 3857718)
Ron..........That looks better than a 100yd hold. What do you think?

I think the choice is bossmoss'.

Muley Hunter 10-07-2011 06:35 AM

I asked what you thought. Boss got his question answered.

Semisane 10-07-2011 07:13 AM

It really doesn't matter what you use as zero, so long as you know the trajectory of your load and have a reasonably accurate estimate of the distance when you shoot at game. It's not all that difficult to place your sight center of chest, or at the top of the back, or six inches over the back.

But you must know your actual trajectory. I do a "trajectory study" with every gun and hunting load and keep the record. Shoot three shots each at 25, 50, 75, 100, 125, 150 and 175 yards. Then you know two things for sure; (1) the limit of your practical hunting accuracy, and (2) where to place your sights for any particular shot.

Semisane 10-07-2011 07:13 AM

It really doesn't matter what you use as zero, so long as you know the trajectory of your load and have a reasonably accurate estimate of the distance when you shoot at game. It's not all that difficult to place your sight center of chest, or at the top of the back, or six inches over the back.

But you must know your actual trajectory. I do a "trajectory study" with every gun and hunting load and keep the record. Shoot three shots each at 25, 50, 75, 100, 125, 150 and 175 yards. Then you know two things for sure; (1) the limit of your practical hunting accuracy, and (2) where to place your sights for any particular shot.

Muley Hunter 10-07-2011 07:17 AM

I find 6-7" holdover easier to use than 14" at long distances, but that just me.

EndeavorShooter 10-07-2011 07:23 AM


Originally Posted by Semisane (Post 3857870)
It really doesn't matter what you use as zero, so long as you know the trajectory of your load and have a reasonably accurate estimate of the distance when you shoot at game. It's not all that difficult to place your sight center of chest, or at the top of the back, or six inches over the back.

But you must know your actual trajectory. I do a "trajectory study" with every gun and hunting load and keep the record. Shoot three shots each at 25, 50, 75, 100, 125, 150 and 175 yards. Then you know two things for sure; (1) the limit of your practical hunting accuracy, and (2) where to place your sights for any particular shot.


Exactly what i do, as well!! but the reason i zero at 100 is 99% of my shots are at 100 or less. Here in Indiana, where i hunt. unless you are on fields, which i rarely hunt, you will not have a long shot...

it has been my experience that the big boys don't play in the fields, unless it is after legal shooting light or during the rut.

EndeavorShooter 10-07-2011 07:44 AM


Originally Posted by Muley Hunter (Post 3857872)
I find 6-7" holdover easier to use than 14" at long distances, but that just me.


That would be called, a preference!!! but really what is the difference??? whether you hold 6 or 12 you are holding over... When the biggest game you hunt is a whitetail and you hold at the top of the back 12-14" down is all, a dead deer... sounds simple to me!!

bottom line is practice at the distances you plan to shoot... that way when the time arrises, you are confident in your ability to make the shot...

Muley Hunter 10-07-2011 07:47 AM

I always think in terms of elk. 6-7" is still in the kill zone.

I've never even seen a whitetail in my part of Colorado.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:27 PM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.