Go Back  HuntingNet.com Forums > Firearms Forum > Black Powder
Tested trigger pull on 2 muzzys >

Tested trigger pull on 2 muzzys

Black Powder Ask opinions of other hunters on new technology, gear, and the methods of blackpowder hunting.

Tested trigger pull on 2 muzzys

Old 02-27-2011, 04:05 PM
  #11  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Boncarbo,Colorado
Posts: 9,186
Default

Ahhh be brave! I used to have my old 45 deer creek northwest rifle set up for hunting with a 1/2lb trigger! Now that baby was smooth shooting in the field.
MountainDevil54 is offline  
Old 02-27-2011, 05:35 PM
  #12  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Yucca Valley,Ca
Posts: 2,496
Default

Originally Posted by Gm54-120 View Post
Im a bit cautious in the field too but my MK did come from the factory with about 2.5lb trigger. All the rest i have set at about 3-3.5lbs and almost no creep or over travel. I could go lighter but i dont see the need. That amount is fine with the creep set really low and its good enough for 100 yard cloverleafs.
Exactly and when your all pumped up with a buck or whatever in your sights, a 1-1.5 LB difference will never be noticed and it won't go off on accident..once you have personally seen it happen as i have, it will never be worth the risk..leave the 2lb trigger pulls for the bench shooters... Ray
builder459 is offline  
Old 02-27-2011, 06:34 PM
  #13  
Fork Horn
 
quake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 366
Default

Originally Posted by MountainDevil54 View Post
That boy was doing some trash talking and while i had 4 out of 5 shots touching at 100 yards, With the same rifle "Optima" he had a 8" 3 shot string group LOL. He shut up after that.
Lol. Yeah, it's not as easy as it looks. Takes LOTS of practice. Hell, some days I shoot like your brother-in-law. It can be frustrating.
quake is offline  
Old 02-27-2011, 07:37 PM
  #14  
Giant Nontypical
 
Muley Hunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Colorado
Posts: 9,557
Default

It would be better to shoot 8" groups every day.

No disappointment that way.
Muley Hunter is offline  
Old 02-27-2011, 07:39 PM
  #15  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Boncarbo,Colorado
Posts: 9,186
Default

LMAO thats funny! I will have to tell him that one.
MountainDevil54 is offline  
Old 02-28-2011, 02:52 AM
  #16  
Typical Buck
 
Roger46982's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Indiana
Posts: 667
Default

Originally Posted by builder459 View Post
2 lbs is far to low IMHO for a hunting rifle. 3-3.5 is much safer.... Ray
Agree 100%
Roger46982 is offline  
Old 02-28-2011, 07:35 AM
  #17  
Nontypical Buck
 
7.62NATO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,473
Default

It depends on the action of the rifle and the shooter. If the rifle can only fire when the hammer is c0cked (e.g. T/C Omega) and you shoot with a thin glove or bare-fingered, why should 2 lbs be too light if that's what the shooter prefers? There is no reason to c0ck the thing until the shot presents itself.
7.62NATO is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information -

Copyright © 2023 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.