Community
Black Powder Ask opinions of other hunters on new technology, gear, and the methods of blackpowder hunting.

Tested trigger pull on 2 muzzys

Thread Tools
 
Old 02-27-2011 | 03:05 PM
  #11  
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 9,186
Likes: 0
From: Boncarbo,Colorado
Default

Ahhh be brave! I used to have my old 45 deer creek northwest rifle set up for hunting with a 1/2lb trigger! Now that baby was smooth shooting in the field.
MountainDevil54 is offline  
Reply
Old 02-27-2011 | 04:35 PM
  #12  
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,496
Likes: 0
From: Yucca Valley,Ca
Default

Originally Posted by Gm54-120
Im a bit cautious in the field too but my MK did come from the factory with about 2.5lb trigger. All the rest i have set at about 3-3.5lbs and almost no creep or over travel. I could go lighter but i dont see the need. That amount is fine with the creep set really low and its good enough for 100 yard cloverleafs.
Exactly and when your all pumped up with a buck or whatever in your sights, a 1-1.5 LB difference will never be noticed and it won't go off on accident..once you have personally seen it happen as i have, it will never be worth the risk..leave the 2lb trigger pulls for the bench shooters... Ray
builder459 is offline  
Reply
Old 02-27-2011 | 05:34 PM
  #13  
quake's Avatar
Fork Horn
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
From: Indiana
Default

Originally Posted by MountainDevil54
That boy was doing some trash talking and while i had 4 out of 5 shots touching at 100 yards, With the same rifle "Optima" he had a 8" 3 shot string group LOL. He shut up after that.
Lol. Yeah, it's not as easy as it looks. Takes LOTS of practice. Hell, some days I shoot like your brother-in-law. It can be frustrating.
quake is offline  
Reply
Old 02-27-2011 | 06:37 PM
  #14  
Muley Hunter's Avatar
Giant Nontypical
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 9,557
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Default

It would be better to shoot 8" groups every day.

No disappointment that way.
Muley Hunter is offline  
Reply
Old 02-27-2011 | 06:39 PM
  #15  
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 9,186
Likes: 0
From: Boncarbo,Colorado
Default

LMAO thats funny! I will have to tell him that one.
MountainDevil54 is offline  
Reply
Old 02-28-2011 | 01:52 AM
  #16  
Roger46982's Avatar
Typical Buck
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 667
Likes: 0
From: Indiana
Default

Originally Posted by builder459
2 lbs is far to low IMHO for a hunting rifle. 3-3.5 is much safer.... Ray
Agree 100%
Roger46982 is offline  
Reply
Old 02-28-2011 | 06:35 AM
  #17  
7.62NATO's Avatar
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,475
Likes: 0
From: Virginia
Default

It depends on the action of the rifle and the shooter. If the rifle can only fire when the hammer is c0cked (e.g. T/C Omega) and you shoot with a thin glove or bare-fingered, why should 2 lbs be too light if that's what the shooter prefers? There is no reason to c0ck the thing until the shot presents itself.
7.62NATO is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.