Go Back  HuntingNet.com Forums > Firearms Forum > Black Powder
Muzzleloader on TV >

Muzzleloader on TV

Community
Black Powder Ask opinions of other hunters on new technology, gear, and the methods of blackpowder hunting.

Muzzleloader on TV

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-18-2011, 07:50 AM
  #1  
Dominant Buck
Thread Starter
 
cayugad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 21,193
Default Muzzleloader on TV

Did any of you get the chance to watch on the Travel Channel a program called ... The Wild Within? It was interesting in the fact that on the last episode, he used a flintlock muzzleloader to shoot a Bison. His native American guide got him within what looked like 100 yards, although they kept saying 50 yards. Cameras can really distort distance so maybe it was 50 yards.

He was shooting a .50 caliber roundball it appeared. The rifle fired perfect for him, which he was concerned about. But the amazing thing, and the guide even pointed this out... the Bison went maybe (again, what it appeared to be on camera) 20 yards and dropped dead. The guide then congratulates him on the big bull he shot and says.. (Not quoted) I've seen high powered rifles not bring a big bull like that, down that fast.

So besides the fact he was close, and he did not hit the heart. I read his blog and the heart was intact. So I am guessing a lung shot. How could a simple roundball (I watched him load that) do such an effective job? Remember all the experts saying that a roundball was hardly an effective deer load. But he was shooting a Bison. And it worked perfect.

I did scan his blog to see if he mentioned a caliber and load but found nothing. I and am guessing the .50 caliber only on the basis of watching him load the rifle, and the size of the rifle itself. It was a tiny flintlock in his hands. But this was an interesting hunt.

After that buffalo hunt, they were chasing deer up and down the mountain with flintlocks but did not connect. Although they did find an antelope that some one shot and only took choice parts off of. (you wonder if that antelope was staged) but they scavenged off the antelope carcass because it was that fresh.

If you get a chance, it might be worth a look.
cayugad is offline  
Old 01-18-2011, 07:56 AM
  #2  
Giant Nontypical
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 6,585
Default

The PRB especally the 54 caliber is generally much under rated. With in its proper range the 54 is every bit as effective as a highpowered rifle.
lemoyne is offline  
Old 01-18-2011, 07:59 AM
  #3  
Dominant Buck
Thread Starter
 
cayugad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 21,193
Default

And it well could have been a .54 caliber. I wish he'd of stated his caliber and load on the show. But it was a small rifle. He kept saying it was just like the one Lewis and Clark would have used. Well they did use a lot of small calibers, but they also had some large calibers as well.
cayugad is offline  
Old 01-18-2011, 08:09 AM
  #4  
Giant Nontypical
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 5,425
Default

Funny thing is, we don't really know what Lewis & Clark used...

We think some carried either refurbished 1792 contract rifles or 1803 rifles...If the 1803s they got the prototypes wich should have been .54s...If the 1792s they were closer to .48 calibers...

Clark also carried a personal rifle which he discribed as his small rifle...We assume that was a smaller caliber rifle...He did report shooting an elk but not killing it because of the size of his ball...
nchawkeye is offline  
Old 01-18-2011, 08:13 AM
  #5  
Dominant Buck
Thread Starter
 
cayugad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 21,193
Default

They did carry some strange guns on that trip. I was reading the Lewis and Clark journal a while back.
cayugad is offline  
Old 01-18-2011, 09:48 AM
  #6  
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Boncarbo,Colorado
Posts: 9,186
Default

great show! I have the DVR all set to record the series.
MountainDevil54 is offline  
Old 01-18-2011, 10:12 AM
  #7  
Spike
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 90
Default

That is really cool, wish I would have seen it. I have often heard the oldtimers say to use a 22 short to hunt squirrel. They say a 22long will just blow through and the squirrel will make it back to the nest and be lost. I wonder if the same thing is true here. Lower velocity would let the bullet expend all it's energy inside the animal and not just push through. Who knows!
Paul Niskanen is offline  
Old 01-18-2011, 10:18 AM
  #8  
Boone & Crockett
 
Semisane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: River Ridge, LA (Suburb of New Orleans)
Posts: 10,917
Default

I've never seen that show. Gotta check it out. Thanks for the tip.
Semisane is offline  
Old 01-18-2011, 10:37 AM
  #9  
Giant Nontypical
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 5,425
Default

Shot in the head, the squirrel knows no difference between a short or a long rifle...

A short is quieter though, which does seem to scare the other squirrels less...Another funny thing about shorts, they have about the same velocity as our modern target loads, which makes them more accurate in some rifles...My Remington 552 loves both Green Tags and CCI shorts, the shorts are a few bucks cheaper so I usually buy them...
nchawkeye is offline  
Old 01-18-2011, 10:55 AM
  #10  
Spike
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 90
Default

I shoot the green tags out of all my 22's. They are more accurate and make the barrel last longer. My son's 10/22 has some where above 30,000 rounds through it, and will still shoot as accurate as a new gun. I buy in bulk to keep the cost down, and with 4 of us shooting on a regular basis we go through one hell of a bunch of 22 rounds.
Paul Niskanen is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.