What about Maxi balls?
#1
Thread Starter
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,672
Likes: 0
From: Anne Arrundle County, Maryland
I have sighted in both of my new inlines with 245 grain Powerbelts.There are just too many bad vibes connected with these bullets even though they shoot really well.I have always used a 370 grain Maxi Ball in my TC Hawkins and I don't know if they hold together or not because they always blew through both sides and terminated anything I shot,so it really never mattered.I would shoot them out of my inlines but I have been hoping to find a lighter bullet in a conical,because I don't trust sabots.The reason is to get longer shots as I won't shoot the 370 grainer farther than 75 yards.I think they make Maxi Balls as light as 275 grains so if they do I think I will switch to them.Noone ever talks about Maxi Balls and I don't understand why.Any thoughts on this matter will be listened too and considered.
#2
Banned
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 9,186
Likes: 0
From: Boncarbo,Colorado
used the maxi balls once my first year of hunting and switched to powerbelts. Switched one year to great plains conicals and the next year i switched back to powerbelts.
Now i am using Thors but havent shot anything with them yet
I dont like the maxiballs performance at all
Now i am using Thors but havent shot anything with them yet

I dont like the maxiballs performance at all
#3
Thread Starter
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,672
Likes: 0
From: Anne Arrundle County, Maryland
I have killed a bunch of deer with the 370 grain bullets out to 75 yards and closer.I was just checking the Thompson Center web site and it appears the lightest they offer in 50 cal. is 320 grains and I would like to find something about 50 grains lighter in a full bore sized bullet.Any sugestions?
#4
Thread Starter
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,672
Likes: 0
From: Anne Arrundle County, Maryland
used the maxi balls once my first year of hunting and switched to powerbelts. Switched one year to great plains conicals and the next year i switched back to powerbelts.
Now i am using Thors but havent shot anything with them yet
I dont like the maxiballs performance at all
Now i am using Thors but havent shot anything with them yet

I dont like the maxiballs performance at all
#6
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,445
Likes: 0
I've shot lots of deer with Maxiballs, including the 370 gr/50 cal and the 435 gr/54 cal, both with 100 gr loose Pyrodex. My guns were Renegades with peep sights. Those bullets did exactly what I wanted, passthroughs on all but end to end shots. The deer went down quick and blood trails were always good. I don't know what anyone could find lacking in their performance on deer. I kept shots at less than 100, I think about 80-85 yds was my longest shot.
The 300 gr FPB may be worth a try. They hold together better than PowerBelts from what I hear. I've killed 5 deer with the 350 gr version, all passthroughs with good performance.
The 300 gr FPB may be worth a try. They hold together better than PowerBelts from what I hear. I've killed 5 deer with the 350 gr version, all passthroughs with good performance.
#7
Spike
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
From: Byhalia, MS
I'm just curious, what about the sabot do you not trust?
I shoot a TC thunderhawk carbine and have shot probably 70 or more sabot rounds without incident. But when I experimented, buffalo ballets, patched balls, maxi balls, all seemed to do poorly. All but the patched balls weren't tight enough in the bore (.50 cal), even with a wad back of the ballets. Mostly Pyrodex pellets but also played with FFg, various loads and combinations, having been spoiled by starting out my muzzleloading experience with a particularly nice Hawkin gun using Bp w/ patched balls.
Mine is 1:38, and 21" so I needed to drop down to 80g Pyro, versus 100 (2, 50g pellets). This helped burn all the powder but mostly helped with accuracy. I shot green sabots and Nosler .429 (.44 mag) 300g hollow points. With a 4x scope it groups about 2" at 100 yards.
I haven't needed a follow up shot, and usually have a cleaning routine with practicing anyway, where I always shoot from a clean bore. Maybe that's the trouble folks have with sabots. I have loaded 'em back to back w/out cleaning and not had any trouble I can recall.
What sort of trouble do folks have with the sabots?
I shoot a TC thunderhawk carbine and have shot probably 70 or more sabot rounds without incident. But when I experimented, buffalo ballets, patched balls, maxi balls, all seemed to do poorly. All but the patched balls weren't tight enough in the bore (.50 cal), even with a wad back of the ballets. Mostly Pyrodex pellets but also played with FFg, various loads and combinations, having been spoiled by starting out my muzzleloading experience with a particularly nice Hawkin gun using Bp w/ patched balls.
Mine is 1:38, and 21" so I needed to drop down to 80g Pyro, versus 100 (2, 50g pellets). This helped burn all the powder but mostly helped with accuracy. I shot green sabots and Nosler .429 (.44 mag) 300g hollow points. With a 4x scope it groups about 2" at 100 yards.
I haven't needed a follow up shot, and usually have a cleaning routine with practicing anyway, where I always shoot from a clean bore. Maybe that's the trouble folks have with sabots. I have loaded 'em back to back w/out cleaning and not had any trouble I can recall.
What sort of trouble do folks have with the sabots?
#9
DCM
Modern day sabots do not present the plastic fouling that the oldersabots did. The ne w polymere formulation has about eliminated that problem.
If you read the orignal post he ementions he was shooting vey old 'green' 44 cal sabots. Sabots that old were not meant for much of charge and certainly not the heat that T7 or BH would generate. That alone would start the plastic melting and the deposit of fouling - then include the velocity of the sabot up the barrel creating more heat in the petals - plastic fouling is going to occur. The best way and the quickest in the world is boil it out - pore boiling water done the barrel that will melt and dislodge the plastic.
Todays sabot is made of a much different polymere designed for the higher heat, higher pressure of the loads being shot today + the are more accurate than those of the past...
So shoot the heck out of your newer sabots if you got 'em..
What sort of trouble do folks have with the sabots?
Modern day sabots do not present the plastic fouling that the oldersabots did. The ne w polymere formulation has about eliminated that problem.
If you read the orignal post he ementions he was shooting vey old 'green' 44 cal sabots. Sabots that old were not meant for much of charge and certainly not the heat that T7 or BH would generate. That alone would start the plastic melting and the deposit of fouling - then include the velocity of the sabot up the barrel creating more heat in the petals - plastic fouling is going to occur. The best way and the quickest in the world is boil it out - pore boiling water done the barrel that will melt and dislodge the plastic.
Todays sabot is made of a much different polymere designed for the higher heat, higher pressure of the loads being shot today + the are more accurate than those of the past...
So shoot the heck out of your newer sabots if you got 'em..



