Go Back  HuntingNet.com Forums > Firearms Forum > Black Powder
Powder results - BH209 vs. 777 >

Powder results - BH209 vs. 777

Community
Black Powder Ask opinions of other hunters on new technology, gear, and the methods of blackpowder hunting.

Powder results - BH209 vs. 777

Thread Tools
 
Old 11-10-2010, 12:53 PM
  #1  
Fork Horn
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 171
Default Powder results - BH209 vs. 777

After a grueling decision, I picked up an Endeavor barrel for my Encore, and did some testing with it.

I started off with 100gr. 777 pellets and had decent to marginal results, but the bullets I was shooting (250gr. EZ-Glide Shockwave) was not able to be seated after 3-4 shots.

Moved to 100gr. 777 FFFG lose powder, nice groups w/same bullets, and could shoot 5+ shots before fouling got too bad.

After a trip to Cabela's, the only place I could find BH powder, I picked up some 245gr. Barnes Expanders and BH209.
Great groups with 100gr. BH powder and Shockwaves as well as with Barnes bullets, and could shoot a lot before I needed to clean the barrel.
I got the pretty similar results with a clean barrel as I did with a fouled barrel...but I'll hunt with it fouled.

So it looks like 100gr BH w/Barnes bullets on opening day.


The one thing I did notice is the BH had a lot more kick to it than the FFFG 777, anyone care to elaborate???
beast44k is offline  
Old 11-10-2010, 01:00 PM
  #2  
Fork Horn
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 171
Default

Also I found 777 209 primers do not work well with the Endeavor barrel, and had to close the break action pretty hard or the hammer wouldn't click back.
I picked up some Remington 209 primers, which worked fine and seem to have better results with accuracy too.

Also the new style breech plug on the Endeavors are awesome!!!
The mess is decreased by at least 50% and is much easier to clean than the 209x50 mag barrels.

I'd give it 3 thumbs up, but I only have 2 thumbs...!!!

Last edited by beast44k; 11-10-2010 at 01:05 PM.
beast44k is offline  
Old 11-10-2010, 01:38 PM
  #3  
Boone & Crockett
 
sabotloader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Idaho
Posts: 11,703
Default

beast44k

I started off with 100gr. 777 pellets and had decent to marginal results, but the bullets I was shooting (250gr. EZ-Glide Shockwave) was not able to be seated after 3-4 shots.

Moved to 100gr. 777 FFFG lose powder, nice groups w/same bullets, and could shoot 5+ shots before fouling got too bad.
With any T7 powder in most cases you just about have to run a moist patch after each shot or in your case after 3 shots to clear the build up of crude near the bottom of the barrel. I use plain old blue Windex for that procedure.

Great groups with 100gr. BH powder and Shockwaves as well as with Barnes bullets, and could shoot a lot before I needed to clean the barrel.
I got the pretty similar results with a clean barrel as I did with a fouled barrel...but I'll hunt with it fouled.

So it looks like 100gr BH w/Barnes bullets on opening day.
With BH you should not need to clean the barrel at all while shooting. That is the general recommended procedure.

The one thing I did notice is the BH had a lot more kick to it than the FFFG 777, anyone care to elaborate???
That is odd, BH is a smokeless progessive burning powder and usually the kick is some what milder than T7 because it takes longer to burn.

Also I found 777 209 primers do not work well with the Endeavor barrel, and had to close the break action pretty hard or the hammer wouldn't click back.
I picked up some Remington 209 primers, which worked fine and seem to have better results with accuracy too.
It is not recommended to use 777 primers with BH, Western Powders suggests CCI-209M's of Fed-209A's.

The first I heard of this problem Win Primers in a Encore series gun was when FG reported that you could not use them in a TC later he specified the Encore series. When I polled the forum shooters most said they had no problem with Win Primers. Winchester Primers are the longest on the market, so moving to the shorter primer is an answer.

Question for you?
1. do you have a primer extractor installed? we found that the extractor does not always let the primer seat as far into the BP as a bare plug.
2. do you install the BP snug into the bore or do you finger tight or back it of snug when you install the BP?
sabotloader is offline  
Old 11-10-2010, 01:44 PM
  #4  
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Boncarbo,Colorado
Posts: 9,186
Default

Originally Posted by beast44k
Also I found 777 209 primers do not work well with the Endeavor barrel, and had to close the break action pretty hard or the hammer wouldn't click back.
Interesting.
MountainDevil54 is offline  
Old 11-10-2010, 05:14 PM
  #5  
Spike
 
moridgerunner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 80
Default

I finally got out and shot 100 yards with my v1 accura. I was shooting off a solid rest with sandbags with windy conditions but my location was slightly protected. I started off shooting 2 standard 777 pellets and hornady 250 gr. sst-ml(black sabot). The gun was shooting less than m.o.a. I used a damp then a dry patch between shots. After 6 shots I switched to 90 gr. of blackhorn 209-and the point of impact was exactly the same along with less than m.o.a. accuracy. Shooting off the sandbags and seeing the results gives me great confidence! It was nice to know I can shoot either powder without having to adjust my sights.
moridgerunner is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.