Is it poor bullet performance?
#11
Boone & Crockett
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: River Ridge, LA (Suburb of New Orleans)
Posts: 10,917
but struggle to believe a perfectly double lunged deer or heart shot animal goes more then 100 yards.
I posted a detailed report on it here: (LINK: http://huntingnet.com/forum/black-po...grain-xtp.html).
Never had one go more than 50/60 yards before.
#12
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,037
I had a powerbelt blow up on me three years ago. It was an 80 yard shot with 85 grains of 777. Hit a rib and it disintegrated, The doe didn't go very far but I didn't like the looks of that bullet and haven't hunted with one since. I just think there are better options for less money. If I was going to use a powerbelt again it would be a heavy one but then why wouldn't I just use a heavy all lead conical instead? Your results may vary, I know a lot of people like them.
Art
Art
#13
Fork Horn
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: My Range in Central NY
Posts: 320
#15
I think pretty much all of the bullets out there nowadays will get the job done if you
1. Select the proper bullet weight for the game you are hunting
2. Use the proper powder charge for that bullet
3. Put the bullet through the lungs or heart
Although #3 is the most important of them all. A lot of people use Powerbelts successfully - some of the guys I hunt with do. But personally, if I were to use them, I would use a heavier weight powerbelt with a reasonable powder charge (70 - 90 grains).
1. Select the proper bullet weight for the game you are hunting
2. Use the proper powder charge for that bullet
3. Put the bullet through the lungs or heart
Although #3 is the most important of them all. A lot of people use Powerbelts successfully - some of the guys I hunt with do. But personally, if I were to use them, I would use a heavier weight powerbelt with a reasonable powder charge (70 - 90 grains).
#16
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Kerrville, Tx. USA
Posts: 2,722
I do like them though (FPBs). They have killed two elk in the last two years for me.
Last edited by txhunter58; 03-17-2010 at 05:32 PM.
#18
I also have NEVER shot a Powerbelt and Im a CVA shooter, so I cant say one way or the other if there good or bad. I do however shoot only 240gr XTP Mag's (Hornady) I have shot many many Deer with them and never lost a Deer (knock wood) with them. I pride myself in only taking the best shot possible and 99% of my shots are center Lung Shot, the rest Heart or high low Lung. I have had Deer Drop on the spot and run 100yds with the exact same shot on them, some entrance and exit holes are huge others are normal, so go figure, No 2 shots are ever the same results. Also blood trails very from excellant to drops, but as the Winter goes on the Deer put on a Good Fat reserve here in the North so a Deer with a-lot of Fat will plug up the exit and entrance holes in a hurry and no matter what bullet your using you'll sometimes get no blood trail.
I also read Sabotloader's thread on (recovering bullets) and others where the Hornady XTP's come apart, but still for me they have always done there job. I believe any Bullet will do it's job if you do your's and put it where it's suppos-to-be. No Deer will Live with a Bullet through the Lungs or Heart and they wont travel far. The guy's that claim they hit the Animal through the Lungs or Heart and they never recovered them, or did'nt have a bloodtrail could'nt have hit them in a leathal spot, if they did they would have found them.
I have been on many a Tracking Job where the shooter claimed to hit the animal in a good spot and when and if the animal was recovered I never once saw the shot that the shooted reported. Most if not all of them were through the Paunch or back to far or too far forward and some were even Leg Shot! I have never seen a Lung look like a Leg!!!!
(BP)
I also read Sabotloader's thread on (recovering bullets) and others where the Hornady XTP's come apart, but still for me they have always done there job. I believe any Bullet will do it's job if you do your's and put it where it's suppos-to-be. No Deer will Live with a Bullet through the Lungs or Heart and they wont travel far. The guy's that claim they hit the Animal through the Lungs or Heart and they never recovered them, or did'nt have a bloodtrail could'nt have hit them in a leathal spot, if they did they would have found them.
I have been on many a Tracking Job where the shooter claimed to hit the animal in a good spot and when and if the animal was recovered I never once saw the shot that the shooted reported. Most if not all of them were through the Paunch or back to far or too far forward and some were even Leg Shot! I have never seen a Lung look like a Leg!!!!
(BP)
#19
Thanks to all for your replys. You all answered my question. I know I will have to do some expermentation but I got some good starting points. I hunt using traditional archery equipment and know all bout hitting the kill zone. If you take a low percentage shot chanches are you will wound and not recover your prize. From years of hunting with a bow and a center fire rifle I have set strict shooting standards on myself. By doing this and taking only high percentage shots I have taken several Michigan deer. I am a rookie when it comes to muzzel loading and when I hear of a problem (real or made up) I do'nt hesitate in posting to find out from you the experts. Please bear with me through my learning curve. Thanks again to all.
#20
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,519
Here lately i have been shooting too much; almost every day. The bullet i have been shooting a lot is the 270g Gold Dot. I choose to shoot this bullet for a couple of reasons. First, it was excellent this last season when it came to killing deer. Seven deer in 2 states fell to this bullet. I even witnessed lung shot deer fall on the spot, instead of running 75 yard or so. Second, it has been quite inexpensive to shoot. They cost me $14.60 for 50 bullet, and $5.39 for 50 sabot.
I have nothing against paying more for a better product, but in this case, more isn't better, nor necessary.
I have nothing against paying more for a better product, but in this case, more isn't better, nor necessary.