HuntingNet.com Forums

HuntingNet.com Forums (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/)
-   Black Powder (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/black-powder-23/)
-   -   buckmaster or omega (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/black-powder/286945-buckmaster-omega.html)

pond50 02-19-2009 09:41 AM

buckmaster or omega
 

Ihave gift cards for walmart I need to use. I have seen a nikon buckmaster at local store and a nikon omega with nikoplex online.
Which one would you guys think would be best for a cva accura.
Also i have read something about the acurra needing larger screws
for scope base. will cva bases not work or will ineed to get different
ones and where do you get them thank you


spaniel 02-19-2009 10:06 AM

RE: buckmaster or omega
 
I think all Omegas have the ranging reticle, right? With open circles as aiming points? If my understanding of this is correct I have never been a fan of a reticle that does not provide a precise aiming point (crossed lines, mil-dots are ok).

I own a Buckmaster, 3X9 SF it is on my CZ453 .22lr. They are a GREAT scope for the money.

pond50 02-19-2009 10:58 AM

RE: buckmaster or omega
 
Walmartonline catalog website shows an omega with nikoplex.
it may be an oldermodel but they show it was in stock. I think
i would prefer it to the bdc

DrAsus 02-19-2009 03:43 PM

RE: buckmaster or omega
 
I just mounted my omega on my TC triumph. My Omega has the Nikoplex. I was wanting the BDC but couldn't pass up the deal I got from Natchez SS. Plus, I can see what powder/bullet load my guns likes best. I'd go with an Omega over a Buckmaster. I don't know this to be fact, but I believe the Omega has better glass---DrASUS

hunting junkie 02-19-2009 05:10 PM

RE: buckmaster or omega
 

ORIGINAL: spaniel

I think all Omegas have the ranging reticle, right? With open circles as aiming points? If my understanding of this is correct I have never been a fan of a reticle that does not provide a precise aiming point (crossed lines, mil-dots are ok).

I own a Buckmaster, 3X9 SF it is on my CZ453 .22lr. They are a GREAT scope for the money.





No

gregrn43 02-19-2009 06:45 PM

RE: buckmaster or omega
 
I have a buckmaster and its a great scope. Dont have a omega but its a nikon so im sure its a good one to.

spaniel 02-19-2009 06:47 PM

RE: buckmaster or omega
 
It it's got nikoplex, it's going to come down to preference. I think you'd be hard pressed to tell a difference in the glass -- they are both nikon and relatively close in price. There is certainly no problem with the glass in the Buckmaster.

SWThomas 02-20-2009 07:25 AM

RE: buckmaster or omega
 
I own both also and my choice would be the Omega.

lemoyne 02-20-2009 09:34 AM

RE: buckmaster or omega
 
I have tried most of them and found that the Omega gives me the most precise aiming points when paired with a good laser range finder. Instead of just one line the circle gives you the cross at the top and bottom of the circle and the center like a peep. I guess it is all in what you like and are trying to accomplish. Lee


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:26 PM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.