|
RE: is looks worth the extra money
This is something you may be using for a long time, when it comes to function experiance is important, when it comes to looks get what YOU like, because that will make you comfortable later. Lee
|
RE: is looks worth the extra money
well the two gun are the exact same except for the finish the black say it is weathshield but it looks like the plain blue model this will be my muzzleloader for the next several if not 10 years
ORIGINAL: lemoyne This is something you may be using for a long time, when it comes to function experiance is important, when it comes to looks get what YOU like, because that will make you comfortable later. Lee |
RE: is looks worth the extra money
Buds gunshop gave me an estimate of $206 for the Nikon Omega BDC 250 scope. I agree with everybody else, get what you really want. You want regret it.
|
RE: is looks worth the extra money
wow 206 was that the camo or black
ORIGINAL: Nimrodder Buds gunshop gave me an estimate of $206 for the Nikon Omega BDC 250 scope. I agree with everybody else, get what you really want. You want regret it. |
RE: is looks worth the extra money
I don't know if he wants it or not. Maybe - if you read between the lines. Is it worth the $130? Yes if that's what you want. If it doesn't matter - then IMO I don't think its worth the extra $. Besides, I prefer a pretty piece of wood and bright bluingover camo. But if non-glare is what I'm after, I like black synthetic and matte blue. I never was one for the camo finished guns. But everyone has their own taste. And that's why there are so many choices.
|
RE: is looks worth the extra money
i know it comes down to what a person want for them selfs some hate camo.
I am thinking since it is what i want and will keep me from sitting there wondering is the deer going to see the black or not. I am thinking it is worth it heck got it down to around 100 bucks deferents ORIGINAL: bronko22000 I don't know if he wants it or not. Maybe - if you read between the lines. Is it worth the $130? Yes if that's what you want. If it doesn't matter - then IMO I don't think its worth the extra $. Besides, I prefer a pretty piece of wood and bright bluingover camo. But if non-glare is what I'm after, I like black synthetic and matte blue. I never was one for the camo finished guns. But everyone has their own taste. And that's why there are so many choices. |
RE: is looks worth the extra money
Get what you want. One thing to remember is , neither black/blue nor camo puts them on the ground.
|
RE: is looks worth the extra money
ya true
ORIGINAL: David1 Get what you want. One thing to remember is , neither black/blue nor camo puts them on the ground. |
RE: is looks worth the extra money
That was for the matte Nikon Omega.
|
RE: is looks worth the extra money
ya i checked it out they had the camo fro 216 far away from the 369 gander wanted for it
ORIGINAL: Nimrodder That was for the matte Nikon Omega. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:02 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.