Go Back  HuntingNet.com Forums > Firearms Forum > Black Powder
 Hold-over or gradiated reticles? >

Hold-over or gradiated reticles?

Black Powder Ask opinions of other hunters on new technology, gear, and the methods of blackpowder hunting.

Hold-over or gradiated reticles?

Old 02-03-2008, 07:52 AM
  #1  
Fork Horn
Thread Starter
 
eatsleephunt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 411
Default Hold-over or gradiated reticles?

Who prefers what and why?

As more of a rifle shooter I actually have a preferrence towards hold over. I shoot enough, handload, and just know how to hold on an animal. I have a range finder, but am a pretty good estimator to 400 yds. Don't miss too often.

So, I am leaning towards holdover for a ML scope, I like Leupolds FDR, but have been looking at their LDR. (I mean LRD, or long range reticle) It basically has a duplex-type crosshair with a couple of ranging dots equally spaced below the center.

Any advise, experience, suggestions?

Dan
eatsleephunt is offline  
Old 02-03-2008, 08:17 AM
  #2  
Nontypical Buck
 
wabi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: southwest Ohio
Posts: 1,047
Default RE: Hold-over or gradiated reticles?

Hold over/under suits me best.
I had a crossbow scope with one crosshair and one aiming point above & three under. It is designed for a 20 yard zero with the crosshair and the point above is for 10 yards, with the points below being 30 - 40 - 50 yards. Very accurate, but I've been shooting with a scope with one crosshair and using hold over/under for decades now. Too many times in hunting and 3-D shooting, when the pressure was on, I forgot all about the range markings and used the crosshair (and missed) [:@]
I finally got a crossbow scope with 3 crosshairs! With 3 crosshairs in the view I have to slow down and think!
Never tried a ranging type reticle on a muzzleloader scope, but I figure I would make the same mistakes, so I just stick to hold over/under and the KISS theory.
wabi is offline  
Old 02-03-2008, 08:24 AM
  #3  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location:
Posts: 1,408
Default RE: Hold-over or gradiated reticles?

I'm a fan of precision. Hold-over is not precise. Graduated reticles are a little better, but holds must still be used as no reticle is exact for any gun.

When I hold on a deer, I want the bullet to go where the crosshairs are. I used hold in my younger years, but really dislike them with a ML for anything over 200 yds. My ML wears a tactical scope so I can dial to the exact range and hold right on.
spaniel is offline  
Old 02-03-2008, 08:29 AM
  #4  
Boone & Crockett
 
bronko22000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Eastern PA
Posts: 12,737
Default RE: Hold-over or gradiated reticles?

I'm a firm believer in the graduated scope. I wasn't until a few years ago when I purchased my first Burris scope with the ballistic-plex. When set up properly and verified at the extended ranges it is terrific. I've since purchase 3 more I like them that much. They work. The only rifles I don't have these on are the ones that I know I won't use where shooting 300+ may present itself.
As for putting one on a ML - that's not my cup o tea but if the ads are right, that Nikon one should work nice for you.
bronko22000 is offline  
Old 02-03-2008, 08:33 AM
  #5  
Fork Horn
Thread Starter
 
eatsleephunt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 411
Default RE: Hold-over or gradiated reticles?

I've never used a tactical scope that required adjustment prior to the shot. Other than side paralax/focus adjustment.

I'm asking if an adjustment under hunting conditions (after determining range), has a significant effect on the time or lack thereof you have to make the actual kill shot. Do you hunt a little differently because of this, stand hunting...? Etc. Or maybe a better question is, do you find yourself not using certain hunting methods because it may take more time to adjust your equip?

I've always stayed away from one pin adjustable archery sites for the same reason, they take too long to calibrate at close range. But, maybe a turret adjustment on a scope is different? Maybe more like the reflex of sticking a piece of brass in your shirt pocket for reloading purposes rather than letting it hit he ground as you cycle for a second shot? Sometimes I do that sometimes not, depends on the situation.
eatsleephunt is offline  
Old 02-03-2008, 08:48 AM
  #6  
Typical Buck
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 986
Default RE: Hold-over or gradiated reticles?

Glad to hear that you like the Burris. I have a preference for Burris scopes and decided to skip the Omega scope and go with the Burris Ballistic plex for three of my muzzleloaders. Now if I could just get enough time to determine which one is the best rifle and where it shoots at each range I may be happy. Maybe not??? I do like the dots below the crosshairs and should be able to assign a range to each. Have passed up shots over 100 yards with standard scopes as I do not trust hold over for me.
MLKeith is offline  
Old 02-03-2008, 09:13 AM
  #7  
Typical Buck
 
hossdaniels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Person Co. NC
Posts: 884
Default RE: Hold-over or gradiated reticles?

Graduated recticles are a must for ML'ing IMO. With a rifle at 400 yds your only 15-18" low, easy because thats about deer sized. With a Ml its not uncommon to be over 40" low at 300 yrds and thats alot harder to "eyeball". The ballistic recticles can help, at long range you can lose 4" every 10 yds. Range finder becomes a necessity real quick. I havea burris ballistic plex on my ml and I love it, shots past 225 wouldn't possible (for me) without it. On my rifle, the marks are 200yds-1.5moa, 250yds-4.5moa, and 300yds-7.5 moa.(and hopefully soon the bottom post-11moa will be 340-350yds after some load tweaking.)
hossdaniels is offline  
Old 02-03-2008, 10:00 AM
  #8  
Fork Horn
Thread Starter
 
eatsleephunt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 411
Default RE: Hold-over or gradiated reticles?

Okay, I think I am between the Leupold 4.5-14 x 40 BC, and the Burris ballistic plex. Which Burris do you have exactly? I see one for standard cartridges, magnums, 17 hornady magnum and long rifle. Is there a specific one for ML's?

Dan
eatsleephunt is offline  
Old 02-03-2008, 10:14 AM
  #9  
Boone & Crockett
 
sabotloader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Idaho
Posts: 11,703
Default RE: Hold-over or gradiated reticles?

eatsleephunt

I guess it is my feelings that hold over/under works and often works well with practice because the calculations are occurring in your head. But for precison I would prefer the graduations in the scope.

There are basically two methods that seem to be raising to the surface. A mil-dot type reticule and ballistic compensation type reticule. For many years te military survived on the mil-dot for both elevation and windage - today many compainies are offering compensation type reticules.

Personally I guess both types will required education and i do believe that both types are going to be better than "dead reckoning" especially as the range increases.
sabotloader is offline  
Old 02-03-2008, 10:20 AM
  #10  
Typical Buck
 
hossdaniels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Person Co. NC
Posts: 884
Default RE: Hold-over or gradiated reticles?

http://www.burrisoptics.com/pdf/BPlxSlugMuzz.pdf the MZ numbers are at the bottom, You still have to do the range time, but its good enough to get on paper.
hossdaniels is offline  

Quick Reply: Hold-over or gradiated reticles?


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.