really??
02-01-2007 | 08:09 PM
#1
Thread Starter
Giant Nontypical
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 9,085
Likes: 0
From: PA
really??
all i can say is...wow. innovative...thats for sure..hope this wasnt posted already...i missed it if it was and appologize...i found it posted on another forum.....
http://www.cva.com/products/rifle_electra.htm
http://www.cva.com/products/rifle_electra.htm
02-01-2007 | 08:16 PM
#3
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,081
Likes: 0
From: New Mexico
RE: really??
02-01-2007 | 09:04 PM
#4
Typical Buck
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 973
Likes: 0
From:
RE: really??
I wouldn't be so sure this doesn't take hold.
I read the previous posts associated with this gun and it reminded me a lot of comments I heard from fellow recurve shooters when compounds showed up or things fellow sidelock shooters said when in-lines made the scene. I can't imagine why anyone would carry a heavy compound bow laden with all it's gadgets into the woods or why someone buys a muzzleloading rifle with a plastic stock. Yet most who read this and millions of others have. It has a lot to do with the way things are when you get your introduction. Things like this succeed because they reduce work or improve the liklihood of sucess. Is it "good"? I don't know. I do think there will be fewer hunting opportunities in the future as improved technology meets less habitat. But then, I suspect there will be fewer and fewer hunters too. I can guarantee you, I will never own one.
I read the previous posts associated with this gun and it reminded me a lot of comments I heard from fellow recurve shooters when compounds showed up or things fellow sidelock shooters said when in-lines made the scene. I can't imagine why anyone would carry a heavy compound bow laden with all it's gadgets into the woods or why someone buys a muzzleloading rifle with a plastic stock. Yet most who read this and millions of others have. It has a lot to do with the way things are when you get your introduction. Things like this succeed because they reduce work or improve the liklihood of sucess. Is it "good"? I don't know. I do think there will be fewer hunting opportunities in the future as improved technology meets less habitat. But then, I suspect there will be fewer and fewer hunters too. I can guarantee you, I will never own one.
02-01-2007 | 09:14 PM
#5
Thread Starter
Giant Nontypical
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 9,085
Likes: 0
From: PA
RE: really??
dang...i knew it had to be posted...sorry guys. i missed it. im still amazed...i guess it was only a matter of time..itll be interesting to see what kinda ride is instore for that thing...
02-03-2007 | 01:48 PM
#9
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
From: East Tennessee
RE: really??
I am one that doesn't see a future for this product. Remington tried it and I belive they discontiued it. I wionder if the will eventually "hi tech" the ML so we have the same problems everywhere those folks in CO and ID have.
