Go Back  HuntingNet.com Forums > General Hunting Forums > Big Game Hunting
 The "Side arm vs Grizzly" thread got me thinking >

The "Side arm vs Grizzly" thread got me thinking

Community
Big Game Hunting Moose, elk, mulies, caribou, bear, goats, and sheep are all covered here.

The "Side arm vs Grizzly" thread got me thinking

Thread Tools
 
Old 02-16-2008, 09:28 PM
  #11  
Boone & Crockett
 
James B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Wall SD USA & Jamestown ND
Posts: 11,474
Default RE: The "Side arm vs Grizzly" thread got me thinking

Many under estimate the stopping power of a 300 Plus grain Handgun bullet at close range. Would I rather have a 12 Ga with Dixie slugs? yes but a 44 mag or larger handgun is no slouch either. I would be pretty happy with the 7600 Remington in 30-06 or 35 Whelen or the Marlin in 450 or 45-70.
James B is offline  
Old 02-18-2008, 09:05 PM
  #12  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: WY
Posts: 2,056
Default RE: The "Side arm vs Grizzly" thread got me thinking

My buddies and I used to practice scenarios such as this one - though this was way more open. We practiced in an alder thicket.

You all can certainly do whatever you want in a situation like this. If all you have is a handgun, you'd better use it. Me - I'll always take my .375 H&H over ANY handgun. Quite obviously, you're taking your life into your hands in a situation such as this. What odds do you want toplace on your living through such an encounter?
homers brother is offline  
Old 02-20-2008, 06:00 PM
  #13  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: MN USA
Posts: 1,392
Default RE: The "Side arm vs Grizzly" thread got me thinking

I'd agree that a high-power magnum rifle with a partition or bonded core bullet would be the first choice, if it came to defending yourself from imminent charge. However, if you have a target running at you and your rifle is scoped, within 50 yards, the rifle would become much more difficult to get off an aimed shot than a magnum revolver of .44 or more powerful.
Let's hope we never have to use either for that purpose.
MinnFinn is offline  
Old 02-24-2008, 10:19 AM
  #14  
Spike
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 30
Default RE: The "Side arm vs Grizzly" thread got me thinking

.50 AE has more energy and more penetration than a 12 ga. slug. Worst case, if the bear gets you, you might still be able to shoot.

Ideally you pop it with a big rifle before it gets too close. Cleaning a kill? Rounding up some firewood? You might not have that rifle.
nethunter is offline  
Old 02-24-2008, 01:51 PM
  #15  
Typical Buck
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Cologne, MN
Posts: 510
Default RE: The "Side arm vs Grizzly" thread got me thinking

I'd seen another encounter on Easton hunting show where the bear charged from a river bank at these guys in a raft. The guide fired a warning shot in front of bear (Hit water) and turned it. I'd seen this Cabelas show in the video and that was the only thing I questioned is why he didn't try a quick warning shot in front of bear when it first started coming as he had alot more time than the river charge. Of course I wasn't there so it's easy to be an armchair quarterback here too. It was just really unfortunate for the sow and cub in this case but better that than lose of human life...
ironranger is offline  
Old 02-25-2008, 09:39 AM
  #16  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1
Default RE: The "Side arm vs Grizzly" thread got me thinking

check these out, i would feel a little more comfortable with a belt full of these!

http://www.sportsmansguide.com/net/cb/cb.aspx?a=377126
mnss1 is offline  
Old 03-04-2008, 01:31 PM
  #17  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location:
Posts: 28
Default RE: The "Side arm vs Grizzly" thread got me thinking

My son lives just out of Fairbanks. He tells me that more nasty bear encounters occur after a hunter has made a kill than any other time. I know for a fact, we had a bear come running to us immediately after we'd taken a Dahl Sheep. We were well above the timberline and could see her about 3/4 mile away before taking the shot at the sheep. However, when the rifle went off, she turned and came toward us in almost a run. It was like the rifle going off was her dinner bell. Luckily, she held up at about 100 yards and just really looked us over for awhile. Made me a bit nervous to be on my knees field dressing a sheep and having a bear watching it all happen. Needless to say, I don't know how I could have gotten it done if my son hadn't been right there with me to stand up and keep the bear in sight the whole time. I guess that's why you don't hunt alone in Alaska.

Regards, & Good Huntin',
LlindeX
LlindeX is offline  
Old 03-07-2008, 10:02 AM
  #18  
Typical Buck
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Carbon County Pa.
Posts: 601
Default RE: The "Side arm vs Grizzly" thread got me thinking

Did anybody take notice, The guide had open sites on his rifle. you can't be messing around trying to get her in the crosshair of a scope in that situation.
pats102862 is offline  
Old 03-09-2008, 07:29 PM
  #19  
Spike
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 69
Default RE: The "Side arm vs Grizzly" thread got me thinking

The way I look at it there are only 3 options. 12 ga. pump shotgun, pepper sprayor nothing at all.

Based on what I've read the preferrable shot placement is a brain the size of a pop can. Factor into that formula a bouncing moving target and a large amount of excitement. If hiting the brain is the only viable option of stopping the griz than using a hand gun is out. (I'm figuring most of us are not great shots with a hand gun).

If pepper spray only works under the best conditions (e.g. mountain winds) this may be a better option than the hand gun but not the best option.

The option I'm leaning toward is the pump shotgun with either 00 buck or slugs. Probably the 00 buck in the chamberfollowed by another 00 and thanseveral slugs. At 20, 30, or 40 yards I know I could get a lot closer at hitting that pop canevery time with the shotgun over the hand gun. I think I also could get back on target quicker after the previous shot with the shotgun.The first shot will be in the air to scare off the bear.

If there are several of us hunting together and if my friend gets attacked I don't want to be shooting using the 00 buck or the hand gun nor do I want my friend shooting at the bear, if withina few feet of me, with the 00 or hand gun. If someone is hit with a bulletthey could be in worse shape than a mauling. Remember we're probably a few hours from help.

The draw back to carrying the shotgun is the size but a sling would help nicely with that.

The other thing to consider is if you're hunting with another person or two maybe more people would help stop a charge and expecially if more than one person is shooting.

I believe Winchester makes a nice pump (name excapes me at the moment) for about $300.

Let's hope we'll never have to find out which option is best.
Double Droptine is offline  
Old 03-09-2008, 08:59 PM
  #20  
Nontypical Buck
 
SouthDakotaHunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,324
Default RE: The "Side arm vs Grizzly" thread got me thinking

ORIGINAL: ironranger

the only thing I questioned is why he didn't try a quick warning shot in front of bear when it first started coming as he had alot more time than the river charge.
I was thinking the same thing as I was watching it... Right when the animals started their direction I was saying to my self "shoot one in the dirt in front of her"....
SouthDakotaHunter is offline  


Quick Reply: The "Side arm vs Grizzly" thread got me thinking


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.