HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - please tell me just one negative to crossbows
Old 04-06-2005 | 04:05 PM
  #926  
datamax
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,678
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: please tell me just one negative to crossbows

So what about the other 98% of traditional shooters who would also be opposed to xbows in archery season? What will you say when you lose you "hypocrisy" argument?
trad archers hate compounds and crossbows - i thought you knew this ? Its why we're called Elitists

Data you wouldn't see a negative reason if it fell from the sky and landed on your face, then wiggled. And please .. the compound to crossbow argument is HORRIBLE.. it's not valid. You are arguing the similarities in diffeent weapons, like ML's and shotguns .. without seein gthat they are different.
Actually, muzzleloaders and inlines ARE quite close in the way they function and their performances. Real close actually. In fact, so close some shotguns you can get muzzleloader barrels, and some muzzleloaders you can get shotgun barrels !

Crossbows and compounds share much - neither have any similarities to ammount to anything with recurves/longbows. You can bounce up and down all you want, but it simply isn't true and we've SHOWED you the facts

But you can't use the rifle or pistol during muzzleloader season .. and they are similar, right?
Why can't you ? The difference is obvious between rifles/pistols and muzzleloaders - that being muzzleloaders don't have shelled casing and are single shot weapons. Inlines are way, WAY different than muzzleloaders 15 years ago and in fact, banned by some states up until recently because they pushed too far into what IS and ISN'T a muzzleloader.

They are similar, but different in the way they functions and their , for lack of better words "mechanics". Hey - so are compounds !
datamax is offline  
Reply