HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - please tell me just one negative to crossbows
Old 04-05-2005 | 01:57 PM
  #786  
MNRut
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: please tell me just one negative to crossbows

ORIGINAL: silentassassin

Wow, and this whole time I thought you guys were claiming that xbows were infact less effective than compunds due to K.E.

It's kind of funny how the facts change to suit your argument
From a range, trajectory, and KE standpoint they are less effective. I didn't say they wern't simpler to shoot I said they were less effective (i.e. you can't kill a deer as far with your crossbow as I can with my compound nor out shoot me with). No one, that I am aware of, ever implied they were simpler to shoot than trad equipment. I think they are even simpler to shoot than a compound but. But, when you take a guy that's really good and put a compound that's infinitely tunable in his hand and you take a guy thats really good and put crossbow in his hand, the guy with the compound is going to wax the crossbow guys @SS every time. That doesn't imply IMO that I think they would have a lower success rate than trad equipment but that was a nice try
I'm not comparing the effectiveness of the xbow to traditional, I'm comparing it to the effectiveness of compounds.

Why allow another inferior weapon into archery season?
MNRut is offline  
Reply