I'm sorry if I am comming across wrong here, but I am to say the least pissed. Facts were asked for and provided. I cannot see a better fact than the states that have allowed crossbows into the archery season have had NO ILL EFFECTS from having them in their season. Some of you then go as far as to ask for
peer-reviewed scholarly study into the effects of crossbows on archery season
To me that is grasping at straws because you were just proved wrong.
So if there is NOT a study published then it's not true? What kind of mentality is that? That is what case studies are for and again what better case study is there than a state that already allows them? So you then need to look into THAT state and see if there has been any adverse effects and as datamax provided there is none.