HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - please tell me just one negative to crossbows
Old 03-30-2005 | 11:49 AM
  #553  
BigJ71's Avatar
BigJ71
Site Bouncer
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,099
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
Default RE: please tell me just one negative to crossbows

Actually no. What I posted was a fact. Anyone here can try and pick it apart but they wont succeed because it is fact. It is without a doubt the shooting proccess differences between the two down to a T.
What you posted was also a fact. I'm not argueing that. By definition (dictionary) a crossbow is a bow. A crossbow pistol is a bow. A 300win mag is a firearm. A .50 cal muzzle loader is a firearm. A .22 rimfire is a firearm.

O.K. Lets hash out what we've accomplished so far.

A thread was started supposedly to debate the impacts of crossbow during general archery season. In doing so , the original poster belittled , degraded , and humiliated compound shooters in the process.

Name calling ensued , individual degrading occurred , silly bets were made , and in the end the folks who were against crossbows in general archery season before are still against them. Some of the folks who were against crossbow use before are probably even more against it now due to the tactics used in trying to get a message accross. The folks who were in favor of crossbows are still in favor of crossbows. Some maybe even more due to the personal attacks generated from this thread.

So here we are with over 50 pages of crap!

If any bets are made?

Here's one thats a given.

I'd be willing to bet that within 10 years the majority of states will allow crossbows during the general archery season. Do a search on how many states are currently looking at the crossbow issue seriously. You'll be surprised. I know my state will vote on it next month.

If the crossbow proponents win? I dont wish this very often but if they win I sure as hell hope you guys are right and I'm wrong!

It's been fun!
Bowfanatic,

I don't think I made myself clear enough. What I was trying to say was the quote you used was from a person and HIS idea of how the two are different. What I failed to say is that I also agree completely with his description and I don't think it could be better said. That being said it still has no bearing on the dictionary and it's definition of what constitutes a bow.

I also agree that I don't think there will be any changes in the sides but I do believe some eyes were opened on both sides. I tried to stay above name calling and if I offended anyone I apologize it was not my intent.
BigJ71 is offline  
Reply