Look , you fellas are debating the crossbow issue. Some of you refuse to see/admit the differences between a crossbow and a compound so I searched for a well thought out response that summed up my own feelings. The truth of the matter is , the quote I posted is fact pure and simple. Your refusal to accept that fact is no different than my refusal to accept the possibility or even the probability that crossbows wont have a negative impact on our general archery season. So what do ya say we stop degrading each other from here on out?
I never said that there weren't differences between the two quite the contrary. I believe there are differences between the two, but I also believe that there are similarities as well. In fact enough similarities that they are both considered to be "bows"
The quote you posted was someones opinion no? not fact. What I posted WAS fact as it is straight from the dictionary. How much more factual can it get?