Now you can spew your bull**** all you want about stocks and sights but in the real world the bows perform the same. You fixate on irrelevant differences to make separation since you recognize that there’s no rational reason to reject one bow from the archery season while tolerating the other.
Buckmaster,
I made this point seems like a thousand times before and nobody listened then and I doubt they will now.
How does it HURT you if somebody else chooses a different, but no more effective bow?
I have asked this question seem like a thousand times before and nobody has answered it yet and I doubt they will now.
The bottom line is this a crossbow is a form of a BOW and not a form of a FIREARM. For the life of me I can't believe that grown up adults can't see the BASIC and EXTREME differences between the two. You can state all you want about cocking and safeties and sights and so on...... it's still a bow. A S&W model 29 revolver (as with most double action revolvers don't have a safeties does that mean they are not guns?????
You people are splitting hairs about COMPONENTS of a firearm or a crossbow or a compound bow. It still does not change the BASIC fact that one is a firearm and the others are bows