HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - 40cal vs. 9mm
View Single Post
Old 03-15-2005 | 12:10 PM
  #4  
Rebel Hog's Avatar
Rebel Hog
Dominant Buck
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 26,323
Likes: 0
From: WC FL
Default RE: 40cal vs. 9mm

ORIGINAL: driftrider

.40cal>10mm
9mm>.36cal
There's only .004 different,
I'd like to respectfully disagree with you Rebel Hog.

The 9mm Luger has a nominal bore diameter of .355" for jacketed bullets. The .40S&W's nominal bore is .400", for a difference of .045", which is significant. The .40S&W is obviously larger diameter, but they both fit in the same size magazines, with the 9mm having a few more rounds capacity in a given sized magazine (now that the retarded AWB has expired and full capacity mags are legal again).

To answer Bucky's question about "knockdown power." With premium defensive JHP loads, both are very similar with the .40S&W having a slight advantage. Accuracy for both is more dependant on the gun than the cartridge. The .40S&W has a bit more recoil, but generally less than the .45ACP in my experience.

Mike

Drift, I was THOUGHTING when I should have been THINKING...Thanks!
Rebel Hog is offline  
Reply