PAbowhntr...lol...I know ya hate me man but it's good to see we have some common ground.
HuntingBry...good points but how much money is that yo yo that goes out once a year to blast anything in sight going to spend. Isn't that the type of guy who really has nothing vested anyway? If they don't have time to hunt then do they really have any time at all to practice and become a safe and better hunter? That kind of hunter sounds dangerous to me and I personally wouldn't mind them not being in the woods during the season.
Tazzer...as the Roman emperors set out to "make the world Rome", I intend to make the deer hunting world Kansas. <img src=icon_smile_wink.gif border=0 align=middle><img src=icon_smile_clown.gif border=0 align=middle><img src=icon_smile_tongue.gif border=0 align=middle> But to seriously answer your question about an overpopulated area...although I don't gun hunt, I do understand it's value and necessecity in controlling the deer population and do realize a gun season will always be needed. I am however, pro shotgun only and muzzleloader season. As far as points restrictions in an over populated area, it all depends on what the balance of the herd is in the area. I'm just guessing but I would think most overpopulated areas have huge numbers of does vs. bucks.
Silentarsehole...bite me<img src=icon_smile_tongue.gif border=0 align=middle><img src=icon_smile_shock.gif border=0 align=middle>..don't fret buddy, I don't think you're a loser. (by the way, it is spelled l-o-s-e-r, not l-o-o-s-e-r) I hope you shoot better than you spell.<img src=icon_smile_tongue.gif border=0 align=middle>