ORIGINAL: silentassassin
Finally, is it really all in the data? To most achers, myself included, all of the high end equipment on the market is going to shoot better than we can. It really isn't rocket science. We tend to make mountains out of mole hills. If I like the way it draws and I like the way it shoots and i can kill deer with it consistently and shoot a decent 3D score with it if I so choose then thats all that I can ask. Does everyone agree that all of the top line bows on the market will do this? I personally don't need Norm Mulaney to tell me whether I like a bow or not.
SA-- This quote in itself tells me alot. You don't want to know or learn from others, and you say it isn't rocket science-- but honestly it can be once you dig into it if one so chooses-- you already have things figured out for yourself as to how far you want to go, or how much tech knowledge you want to store, and honestly, that's fine with me, enjoy! There are many others just like you out there who shoot bows with the same thoughts and I have no quarrel with that, but think of this also for just a minute--
IF everyone had that very same attitude towards shooting a bow, then wouldn't we still all be shooting a "treecurve", honestly? Where would archery technology be today if there wasn't always those others of us out here thinking, tinkering, asking questions, and yes, debating? This is how we come to develop future products that are indeed better, so that everyone else who doesn't want to know "can pick one up and go shoot a deer". Of course there are those of us who do not care about the technical side of the industry---but the flip side is that we also have to have those in it who do, otherwise the industry will stagnate and die in short order.