HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - Does Kinetic Energy = Penetration?
View Single Post
Old 08-22-2002 | 06:41 AM
  #147  
silentassassin
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,445
Likes: 0
From: Memphis TN USA
Default RE: Does Kinetic Energy = Penetration?

<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote<font size=1 face='Verdana, Arial, Helvetica' id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote> Reading comprehension<img src=icon_smile_question.gif border=0 align=middle><hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face='Verdana, Arial, Helvetica' size=2 id=quote>

Don't worry you will get better at it with practice, just keep on trying.


<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=1 face='Verdana, Arial, Helvetica' id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>Both speed and weight have their place in archery , choose which you want , but dont say those that dont choose your way are wrong. <hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face='Verdana, Arial, Helvetica' size=2 id=quote>

Exactly!!!!! I have said that all along.

<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote><font size=1 face='Verdana, Arial, Helvetica' id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote> However , the point I was trying to make to silentassassin was , he gains his kinetic energy by going with the speed , to make up for the low poundage he shoots.<hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face='Verdana, Arial, Helvetica' size=2 id=quote>

The point was that to listen to all of you heavy arrow buffs there is never a time when a light arrow is better than a heavy one. It is all a matter of trade off. Will you trade 25 fps or 10% of your speed for 1 foot pound or 0.0147% of your KE. I personally will not. I was just pointing out to you the reversal in logic or lack there of, which I now see that you have recanted due to your having faith in a phenomenon that existed only in your mathematical calulations.

Protect your hunting rights, &quot;Spay or neuter a liberal.&quot;

Edited by - silentassassin on 08/22/2002 08:05:27
silentassassin is offline  
Reply