HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - Does Kinetic Energy = Penetration?

08-20-2002 | 09:23 AM

#87

silentassassin

Nontypical Buck

Joined: Feb 2003

Posts: 3,445

Likes: 0

From: Memphis TN USA

RE: Does Kinetic Energy = Penetration?

<BLOCKQUOTE id=quotequote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote> Wow, where do I start?

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Then you would be guilty of liable.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I have no idea what you mean by that.

<hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote>

That means you would be guilty of making comments that you could not prove in order to harm someones image or credibility in his or her profession.

<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If that wasn't so we wouldn't have 1 company making aluminums and 5 making carbons including the one that makes aluminums because they were loosing too much market share
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You were the one that stated that Easton (I am assuming) was loosing market share. Market share means a company's Market Value in terms of Owner's Equity (which means a company has stock, which means a company is publically owned) as compared to another similar company. I didn't bring up market share, you did, so you tell me what it has to do with the conversation.
<hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote>

Not in my Business finance classes. Market share is exactly that their share of the market, ie. there are 50 million arrows being sold and they are only selling 10 million of them or 20% whereas they sold 50% of the arrows being sold 5 years ago.

<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>
So answer my question.

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Today these pros could go to any company they wanted to and get sponsorship.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

So, why then didn't Ted go to Magnus and ask for a sponsorship with their standard blades? Magnus makes the blades for him. Personally, I have used standard Magnus 125 heads and Nugent 125 heads, and I see no difference at all in them except for the name. So, why does Ted have to have his name on attached with these blades?
<hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote>

Apparently because he thinks they are the best broadheads on the market and he wants his name to be associated with them. Just like Chuck Adams did with Hoyt some years back. He felt like they were the best so that who he decided to back. I assure you all the other bow manufacturers would have been tickled to have him backing them but he choose Hoyt, just like tead chose Magnus.

Protect your hunting rights, "Spay or neuter a liberal."

Reply

0